Gigabit LTE means that you'll be able to use up your entire high speed data quota in less than a minute, unless the carriers finally update their data pricing models.
How is it that we've ended up with $10 for 10Gb or less of data now for about ten years? In the meantime, we've gone from inefficient EDGE to unbelievably efficient LTE, with HSPA+ available now for, what, the last five years on most GSM family networks?
Yet the data prices haven't budged. The carriers have more bandwidth than ever, more efficient ways of using it than ever, but they still think they're running ancient EDGE or cdma2000 networks.
On a positive note, this is more bandwidth than most people's cable modems. I wonder if the cable industry will catch up.
Ken M is actually funny. Of course, as an Ken M enthusiast I'd add one more reason he's a huge improvement over APK here.
Cultural and social cues too. British people, for example, frequently accuse people from a certain large Northern European country of having no sense of humor. Why? Well, because when they/we (I'm an ex-Brit) make sarcastic comments in front of them, said Northern Europeans take it seriously.
Now I have to assume sarcasm is fairly universal. I'd be surprised if aliens from the Planet Thargh IV are not familiar with the basic concept of "saying the opposite of what you mean because it's absurd, and finding humor in its absurdity". So the chances of said country not actually actually being familiar with the concept is pretty unbelievable.
More likely is that the transmission - the social cues, the way English speaking people exaggerate the first few words of a sarcastic sentence ("Oh a sarcasm detected. Well that's a useful invention!") to indicate that we're being sarcastic and not serious - is different.
There's another location where sarcasm just never seems to work (and, alas, I'm dumb enough not to realize it half the time): The Internet. Or rather, written text, where sarcasm is interpreted as stupidity more often than not. We've even developed cues to try to ensure it's not misinterpretted, from "/s" to fake HTML tags. Again, this suggests everything is about the cues.
Computers probably can detect sarcasm if taught the cues. It ought to be easy: look for cues, determine meaning of sentence, if cues present and interpretation in local context is absurd, call laugh().
Or raiseEyebrow(). Whatever seems appropriate for the lowest form of wit...
I've always used a serif font for reading, san serif, even Helvetica, just isn't the greatest for large amounts of text except in cases - and recentish Kindles aren't one of them - where the resolution is so attrocious that seriffed fonts just aren't practical.
I'm kinda surprised it was as big a deal as it was, I'd have thought most people weren't using Helvetica.
the Tea Party wants to reduce representation.
I seriously doubt you have even the slightest clue what you're on about. This has never been an impediment to you.
When you're willing to see it, it will knock you over with a feather.
Do you mean like, or unlike, the way the Holy Spirit did when I understood that Jesus Christ is the meaning of life?
Early August? He did well, must have filed in January. I didn't get mine until November.
Wayland is a fairly controversial replacement for X11, written by the people currently maintaining the X.org X11 stack.
As the summary implies, Wayland been criticized for lacking significant features of X11 such as network transparency. Defenders have argued that network transparency is a minority application and that they don't like the way it's implemented in X11 anyway,
Those of us who use network transparency are rather bothered by being told that something that works fine for us (and it does, I regularly have to configure LibreOffice systems running on AWS instances, and have never bumped into any of the supposed problems Wayland advocates insist I have) are things we don't really need or want. We're not happy about losing functionality simply so that someone can go from 59fps to 59.5fps when playing Call of Duty.
Previous proposals have varied from proposals for an optional intermediary protocol sitting between Wayland and the client (apparently by people who have no idea what the transparency part of "Network transparency") and even the ability to stream the contents of Windows using H.264.
This proposal sounds, at least at first glance, to be better than those hacks. Hopefully it means they're finally taking the issue seriously.
If I had mod points, I'd mod parent way up.
This idea that you can push all the processing to the client and not pre-render anything for your advert is rediculous.
Exactly. Given the idea that all consensual sex is ok, and that just about anything is consent (as opposed to the old way, where the only consenual sex occurred within a witnessed marriage and everything else was rape) the definition has gotten murky at best.
We can found no scientific discipline, nor a healthy profession on the technical mistakes of the Department of Defense and IBM. -- Edsger Dijkstra