Yes, that's why he qualified the noun phrase "Apple TV" with "much-rumoured", to make it clear to those of at least a basic level of English comprehension that he was referring to the other, rumoured Apple TV product.

While I agree with your point about biology - living things strongly couple to each other in remarkably complex ways - asteroids and debris on the rocky planets are (compared to Earth) completely pristine due to the inertness of their environment, and the processes they are subject to are blissfully easy to model and use in interpretation.

You have clearly never watched one of the finest movies ever made.

AWACS? Galaxy transport full of servers? 747 carrying military intel all-star weightlifting team?

Believe it or not, there are shades of grey between "I don't want 4chan dabbling in national security" and "I am a genocidal totalitarian".

Many animals have such a coating, but not all do. Some of them just have bigger eyes, bigger pupils, better night-adapted biochemistry, or some other adaptation.

It wasn't homeopathy in Jobs' case, it was some sort of special dietary regimen.

I've heard the argument that Jobs was unlucky enough to have a form of the cancer that probably would've have been much better with earlier treatment; that probably doesn't apply to most.

That should've been "business as usual".

The last ten years have not been a good time for the metaphorical pipeline. I'm not sure what's goign to replace it - startups, spinoffs, and publicly funded grand challenges, probably - but business isn't cutting it.

If you're pointing at "a larger body of studies" you're not pointing at one study any more, are you?