Ratings on IMDB:
- Particle Fever, 7.5
- Beavis and Butt-head, 7.6
We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).
Ratings on IMDB:
It means that you don't know that Les is a common English name.
There is nothing stopping you from "using it at work". You just aren't allowed to distribute someone else's code without abiding by their license.
So pay for proprietary code. Nothing is stopping you. Just don't whine that can't sell code that you didn't write or pay for.
A test of intelligence should be dealing with unforeseen input. The problem with chatbots is that they are just giving pre-planned responses. How about trying to land a rocket on the moon while being bombarded with spurious input from a radar device that was accidentally left on? Given the computers in use by NASA in 1969 that's pretty intelligent behavior.
Another would be landing a rocket on a small floating platform. We'll see how that plays out tonight.
It would be a trivial program to listen for the laugh track.
To be fair the test has to be something possible for a human, also
The difference is that the "swiftboaters" were lying and ended up getting sued.
Probably referring to the Prisoner's Dilemma which is a payoff matrix that results in trusting players doing better than rational players.
If police response was less drastic, there would be no swatting. The problem is that police don't just show up, knock on the door, and ask if everything's OK They show up assuming that people in the house are armed and likely to shoot at them. The swatting perpetrator is hoping that people will die and should be prosecuted for attempted murder. If USA did not have its weird belief that guns make you safer then maybe fewer people would be pulling guns out during domestic disputes and fewer would consider it a pastime to incite armed invasions.
Not the same. Embedded development was mostly about reducing cost by replacing custom mechanical and electronic devices with microprocessors and software. IoT is about taking inexpensive things and adding features in order to boost revenue, and also to create new revenue streams by collecting and selling personal data.
I had to google IoT....
I just asked my toaster.
Oh, I assumed it was DNA as in GMO... but it's just DNA... that makes a lot of food!
Possibly more interesting to know which foods are free of DNA. Which would indicate they either had nothing to do with any living organism, are highly processed or both!
Marshmallow peeps are DNA-free!
How big a market is this "defensive" drone problem? Seems more likely the market is bullies chasing down innocent drones
Seems like you are a child who lacks a bass understanding of how drones
are used in the real world.
If you ever leave your mother's basement you are in for a shock, son.
The treble with that remark is that it's totally off-key.
To ensure it's inclusion as default in RSA products.
Yup. $10M to use it as the default encryption mode. They also tried to require it for FIPS certification so pardon my gasps of disbelief.
Have you ever noticed that the people who are always trying to tell you `there's a time for work and a time for play' never find the time for play?