Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
For the out-of-band Slashdot experience (mostly headlines), follow us on Twitter, or Facebook. ×

Comment: Re:Taco's Post About Shopping? (Score 1) 1521 1521

Was it in Slashdot proper or was it in TacoHell? I feel like I read the same ancient post.

On an only tangentially-related note, one of my favorite comments ever was this one:
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=30833&threshold=1&commentsort=0&mode=thread&cid=3313595

Comment: Re:Bundles-schmundles (Score 1) 361 361

I seem to recall that it wasn't bundling the browser so much as dictating what the computer distributors could do. Microsoft did a Darth Vader vs. Lando Calrissian ("But we had a deal!" "I have altered the deal. Pray I do not alter it further.") with the license distribution arrangements they had with vendors like Dell. The vendors were allowed to install a bunch of crapware in their standard Windows distributions that come on the hard drives of new PCs, but they were forbidden to pre-install Netscape, thus cutting off Netscape's air supply. MS threatened to unilaterally change the terms of the license distribution if the vendor installed Netscape. This was an abuse of Microsoft's monopoly power, as the PC vendors had no choice but to do what MS said, since there was no way for the vendors to compete with other PC makers if they couldn't pre-install Windows.

This is possibly covered in the article, but I haven't got around to reading it yet.

Windows

Journal: Active Directory commands

Why is it that when you use Active Directory Users and Computers to copy a user object, it does not copy the description field? You can use the dsmod command to change the description; however, you can't change the address information from dsmod. At least you can change the IP telephone number.

And, I'm mostly posting this to garner a Slashdot Achievement.

Editorial

+ - Good Service -- Bad Software->

Anonymous Coward writes: "Open source software is generally painful to setup and maintain. And it's likely to stay that way because it's open source. Of course, I could hire someone to set it up for me. That's what the service-oriented market is all about. I can get my software for free, try it out, and pay someone for support when I run into trouble. But there's something nagging... setting up sendmail (or qmail, or any of the half-dozen email solutions I've tried) shouldn't be as hard as it is. Why, over the numerous years — as it's been worked on by a brilliant body of hackers — has it remained so obtuse? Read more..."
Link to Original Source

Never say you know a man until you have divided an inheritance with him.

Working...