Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

SigNick (670060)

SigNick
  (email not shown publicly)
by plasmacutter on Wednesday August 20, @12:22AM (#24668449)
Attached to: Japan Demands Probe of iPod Nano Flameouts

Between their replacement of true color displays with crappy TN models which push their own calibration tools off the charts, their terrible all around macbook quality (mine's 1.5 years old and literally falling to pieces, including the graphics unit), and now these exploding batteries (again!, even dUll didn't pull the same mistake twice!), I say the days of apple as a quality brand are over.

Anyone have suggestions on where to buy quality hardware i can load osx86 on?

+ -
 [+] comment, metanod
by Bert64 on Monday August 11, @01:03AM (#24549647)
Attached to: The Effects of Exporting Used PCs To Africa

If they are starving, it's because they don't have sufficient resources to sustain their current population. If you let them starve, the population will contract to a sustainable level. If you give them food, the population will increase to even more unsustainable levels meaning you have to keep giving them food or face an even bigger level of starvation.

They really need to stop having so many kids, smaller families will put far less of a strain on the available resources.

And these third world countries were doing just fine before the europeans went and interfered with them... We really should just leave them alone to make their own way without interference.

+ -
 [+] comment, metanod
by RichardDaGeek on Thursday August 07, @01:03AM (#24502505)
Attached to: $12 MIT Computer Based On NES, Not Apple II
I have to question the usefulness of a 8 bit system in terms of running modern software, as well as being a useful as a whole. I mean does anyone know a modern linux distro that runs on a 8 bit processor?
+ -
 [+] comment
by morgan_greywolf on Tuesday July 15, @09:10AM (#24194147)
Attached to: 1200-Baud Archeology

How long is copyright nowdays?

How old is Mickey Mouse?

+ -
 [+] comment
by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 08, @10:03AM (#24097447)
Attached to: TrueCrypt 6.0 Released

Buy a real computer. Problem solved.

+ -
 [+] comment

  Comment: Sweet (Score 5, Funny) 2008-07-02 11:03

by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 02, @11:03AM (#24029943)
Attached to: Are SSDs Really More Power Efficient?

Now I'm even happier that I paid the extra $1300 for the SSD option in my MacBook Air.

That way it will run out of battery sooner, leaving me free to use a real computer.

+ -
 [+] comment
by andymadigan on Saturday June 28, @12:03PM (#23976925)
Attached to: Where To Draw the Line With Embryo Selection?
How about the various form of twinning that occur, which in rare cases leads to one twin actually becoming part of the other, and needing to be removed so that the fully grown twin can live? That other twin (which cannot survive in any scenario) is human, and it is its own entity.

Here's another case: A woman who with a serious medical condition becomes pregnant. She cannot survive to bring the child to term, and the child will not survive. Can an abortion be performed then? Saving one life instead of killing both of them?

Also, keep in mind, especially in the second case, it is rarely a 100% certainty. There is always a small chance that both will live. Would you require that a woman with a 1% chance of surviving take that chance? Why is that your decision to make? Why is that anyone's choice but her own?

How about all of the embryos that for one reason or another are destroyed by the body itself? Should we be trying to protect those as well? Should we spend money on protecting the "unborn" instead of say, cancer research?

Those embryos are just as much "potential individuals" as all of the children that don't exist because not every fertile human is continually having sex.
+ -
 [+] comment
by Lead Butthead on Saturday June 21, @01:03AM (#23877933)
Attached to: Best Way To Store Digital Video For 20 Years?

With data density so high of late, drives not accessed 'regularly' (according to a former cow-orker that used to work for Quantum and Maxtor) will start losing its content in matter of months.

+ -
 [+] comment
by Vectronic on Wednesday June 18, @04:03PM (#23840501)
Attached to: $50 to Get XP On a New Dell
Yeah, and the reason for the divorce?

She's gaining weight and trying to control you.
+ -
 [+] comment
by Bombula on Wednesday June 18, @03:03PM (#23838311)
Attached to: Wikileaks Gets Hold of Counterinsurgency Manual
It's a terrible tragedy that such a foolhardy strategy has been embraced by our current adminstration. The simple fact is that the garbage advocated in this 'doctrinal' guide is not counter-terrorism, it's merely counter-productive. You can leave aside the entire philosophical argument for fighting fire with water instead of with fire, leading by example, winning over others through cooperation and conversation rather than conflict and so on, and instead simply crunch the numbers: we could save far more American lives for far less money with a War on Drunk Driving or a War on Idiots Driving While Talking On The Phone than we ever will with the War on Terror, to pick just two examples off the top of my head.

We lost 3000 souls on 9/11. Yet we've lost nearly 5000 in Iraq. Meanwhile, we steadily lose 50,000/year to drunk driving, another several thousand to those fools driving while talking on their phones. The numbers simply don't support a War on Terror no matter how you juggle them. This war of abstraction is, in fact, a Campaign of Terror to frighten our citizenry into submission in order keep the current military-industrial complex in power. It is as shameless as it is sickening, and the perpetrators leading the charade should be behind bars instead of in the White House.

+ -
 [+] comment
by Doc Ruby on Friday June 13, @04:03PM (#23780329)
Attached to: SCOTUS Grants Guantanamo Prisoners Habeas Corpus
The Constitution doesn't give us rights. The government doesn't give us rights. We have rights, inalienable rights, that come from "the Creator", whatever that is. The creator is a mysterious, unspecified entity, but it is not the Constitution or the government.

We, the people, create a government to protect those rights. In the USA, we (our forefathers) wrote a Constitution that our representatives explicitly agreed to support and defend. That Constitution creates a government from nothing, that protects those rights.

Those rights are inalienable. Even when the government fails to protect them, we still have those rights. But unless they're protected, we might not have the freedom to exercise them. That is why we create that government, which has no other power or even existence other than as we create it under the Constitution.

Americans aren't magically different from any other people. All people have the same inalienable rights. But what Americans have that is different is an American government that protects those rights. Foreigners have their own governments. It's up to them to protect their rights with their governments. Often they do not. But though it is in America's interest to help everyone we can to protect their rights, it is not automatically America's government's obligation to do so, unless Americans so instruct it. Even when we do, America is obligated to merely help those people free themselves , so they are free to create their own governments to protect their own rights.

That is what is fundamentally wrong with the Iraq War. Wrong with any occupying American government abroad. It's what was right with the US conversion of Japan and Germany from their tyrannies after WWII: we worked for several years to free those people, who then created their own governments.

But though we're not obligated to free anyone but ourselves, though our government is not obligated to protect anyone's rights but our own, our government is never free to violate those rights. The US government has no powers to violate any rights, except temporarily, according to explicit due process, and only when necessary to protect the rights of other Americans - like when jailing criminals, even suspending their rights to vote, freely travel and associate, and even to express themselves.

Americans in foreign lands have reduced protection of our rights by our government, as a matter of practical fact, but not from any change in our rights themselves. Foreigners in foreign lands have foreign governments that factor into the US ability and obligation to protect their rights, which is minimal.

But no one under control of the US, in US territory (including soverign military territory like Guantanamo) can see their rights infringed in any way.

Sometimes that happens. Sometimes the people in the government break the law, violate the Constitution. The Constitution of course has the remedy: prosecution and jail time, even impeachment. The Constitution isn't just some theoretical philosophy, but the only instrument which creates legitimate government power. And its power does not differ in application to anyone on US soil (with the sole and irrelevant exception that a US president must have been born American).

There shouldn't have been any question that Habeas Corpus must apply to everyone in US custody. But of course the 4 dissenting "Justices" in this case also installed George Bush as president. These people are part of a blatantly, flagrantly anti-American conspiracy among themselves to destroy America and everything it stands for.

Everyone knows it. Lots of us say it. But only far too few of us have the courage and integrity to live it. And we, the Americans with a clear conscience, want to bring these evildoers to justice.

The Constitution. Dodging a bullet today that should never have been fired, that should have seen millions of Americans jumping to take the hit. The closeness of this call is just one 87 year old man away from making a total mockery of America as "the land of the free, the home of the brave."
+ -
 [+] comment
by urcreepyneighbor on Tuesday May 27, @11:03AM (#23551429)
Attached to: Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement
You: Haha! I've got it encrypted! wooo! You're SOL, ain't cha?! Fascist!

Them: Give us your passwords or we'll confiscate your device.

You: But.. I... I've got to make a flight! I have riii--

Them: That's it, Bob! Tase that fucker and keep his iPod! We'll show this twat what we Canadians are all a-boot!
+ -
 [+] comment