Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?
Slashdot Deals: Cyber Monday Sale! Courses ranging from coding to project management - all eLearning deals 25% off with coupon code "CYBERMONDAY25". ×

Comment Consumer Law (Score 1) 152

I'm guessing you live in the US? If so, erhaps you should petition your local person of power (senator? congressman? whatever) to address the pitiful consumer laws in your country. In Europe such things are legally bound, in terms of products being fit for purpose for their intended lifetime. In the UK this is implemented in (amongst other things) the Sale of Goods Act which gives you significant ammunition in terms of demanding it be fixed for a period of (I believe) up to 5 years.

Genuinely not trying to be a smart ass; you could be in Europe and be unaware of such laws - hopefully you are. Companies, as a matter of course, will conveniently forget to mention these rights until you beat them around the head with them. But then, that's business - deny deny deny, until you're banged to rights.

Comment That's not how it works (Score 1) 301

Certificate Authorities who operate on the scale absolutely do NOT keep private keys of the issuing intermediate available for harvest. That's what HSMs are for; devices which hold the private key material and perform signing operations on behalf of the CA. The CA can never retrieve the private key(s) so compromising the CA in that scenario should never result in private key disclosure.

Comment Re:Security (Score 1) 139

The main issue is that Oyster does do some level of cleverness. I only ever skimmed the paper so don't recall the details. The main issue in most use cases is that the spec says the token UID should be read-only. When you can buy tokens from China which completely disregard this and let you write sector 0 it's game over immediately for huge swathes of RFID installations which rely on UID alone.

My work ID does door access, printing, loads of stuff. Spoof the UID onto a blank token, remove the chip/antenna, place inside rear cover of watch. Super convenient, but alarmingly easy.

And you know that "tap and go" stuff your credit card has, distinct to the chip & pin functionality, for low-value purchases like a Double Whopper with cheese? Don't even get me started on that...

Comment Re:Inevitable... (Score 3, Insightful) 139

Well thanks Anonymous Coward (latin: buffoonus maximus), but that's a bit of a tenuous jump. I don't even use public transport, I'm just a guy who does a bit of NFC engineering for the day job and knows the difference between the wrong way to do it and the way I do it. The token security is weak, certainly, but it's easy to protect against with some very low-overhead crypto.

Comment Re:And how utterly pointless it is... (Score 1) 195

Well someone got out the pedantic side of the bed this morning. And no, it's an allocation of my ISP's /16. If I'd got the range from RIPE I wouldn't need PTR delegation would I?

I don't actually need the whole block any more, it was something I was doing for a PhD project a few years back. A /27 would do me these days, but they don't seem in a hurry to have them back.

Comment Re: And how utterly pointless it is... (Score 4, Informative) 195

Very well put. Getting a large ISP whose staff "follow the flowchart" to provide such things is not as easy as some make out. I have a number of non-catalogue products including bonded FTTC which has saved me a fortune on what I used to pay for dedicated hosting (I don't need 5 9's uptime). Instead of a call centre grunt giving a standard "We don't provide that service" response, I get a technically literate person on the end of the phone who understands what I'm asking for and says "Let me have a word, see what we can do". You pay for that kind of service, but for me it's worth it.

Comment And how utterly pointless it is... (Score 4, Informative) 195

Personally I'm not a big user of these kind of services, but it's only a handful of the "big" ISPs who are doing the blocking. I prefer a more personal service so I use a small ISP which offers special geeky extras (full class C, reverse NS delegation etc) and they perform no such blocking. But even if I didn't it's trivial to bypass such blunt instruments.

Comment Re:SSH? (Score 1) 607

The proper way to do it is to have a 100% offline CA with its key material split over a number of smart cards so the CA can only be brought up periodically for signing purposes when a certain number of cards are present (say 3 of 5) and even then you use an HSM which performs all activities hence the private key is never accessible even if you wanted it to be. You store the cards in fireproof safes in geographically dispersed secure physical locations, cardholders travel by different modes of transport, at different times of day, stay at different hotels etc. For day-to-day certificate issuance and signing you have a subordinate CA sat in a networked HSM. That way there can only ever be a minuscule (I'd never use the word impossible) risk that the root CA can be compromised and you maintain the ability to revoke the day-to-day CA.

90% of a good PKI is process and governance, not the technology itself.

I suspect what's going on here is that the NSA has the ability to cut certs for things like *, * etc from a trusted commercial CA whose root is already installed in everybody's browser, hence they can man-in-the-middle the traffic without raising alarm. A few sneaky BGP advertisements and this would be surprisingly easy to do.

It's pretty shocking to read most of the comments on here and realise that very few people actually know how PKI works even at the most basic level.

Comment To illustrate the technical idiocy... (Score 3, Funny) 227

I decided, having had a couple of stiff ones (drinks) this evening, to drop them a line via the website in an attempt to contribute a tiny amount of sanity and/or education.

Unfortunately I was told my email could not contain anything other then [0-9|a-z] IN THE BODY and due to my use of punctuation I was not allowed to email them. I was going to "correct" my correspondence, but the I thought "fuck it, I've got work tomorrow", and I have a glass of wine and 2/3 of a frankly very good cigar to do in.

Submission + - Great, Russia's Crops Just Failed (

Lasrick writes: "While everyone else was worrying about hurricanes, the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization quietly published its own news of a disaster, the body’s November “Food Outlook” report." Good short post on the problems that are bound to cascade from Russia's crop failure

Submission + - Critical Vulnerabilities found in Call of Duty:MW3, CryEngine 3 (

hypnosec writes: Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 and CryEngine 3 graphics platform suffer from critical vulnerabilities, two security researchers have revealed. ReVuln security consultants Luigi Auriemma and Donato Ferrante presented results of their research at the Power of Community (POC2012) security conference in Seoul and said that not only hackers but also other online gaming companies can benefit by exploiting these vulnerabilities. The security researchers have revealed that online gaming companies can try and steal a competitor's players or shut down a competitor’s game completely.

A fanatic is a person who can't change his mind and won't change the subject. - Winston Churchill