Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!
I use 2ROT13.
As stated, only partially.
And at that, the 2 are members of the European Parliament. The Pirate Party have no members in the national parliament.
Is there an actual source for the claim that money are going to drugs and houses?
I have a friend who views the Like button like a Subscribe button.
I can't say that he's totally wrong.
He didn't flee the country. He was here, wasn't called for questioning and asked for permission to leave.
He got told that he wasn't wanted for questioning and so could leave.
Then all sorts of things broke loose and not only was he now wanted for questioning,
the questioning couldn't be done over the phone, videolink of even in person in the Swedish embassy.
No, it had to be in person in Sweden, and he also had to be arrested, for you know,
Assange isn't facing a trial, he is facing QUESTIONING.
People are confused since there is an arrest warrant out for him,
and well, that confuses me too.
It's important to point out there that Assange did stay in Sweden for a while after the alleged incident, but wasn't called for questioning.
He then asked for permission to leave the country and got it approved. Probably since, well, he wasn't charged with anything.
Now, he still isn't charged with anything, but he is wanted for questioning. The problem is seemingly that while the questioning is fine,
there is also an arrest warrant out for him, for said questioning. We usually don't arrest people in Sweden that aren't even charged with anything,
so it does smell a bit bad.
Socialist Sweden feels pretty free to me. It's also quite charitable.
But perhaps you were just trolling?
I can attest to that. I lived in Ireland for six years. I'm now back in Scandinavia and is more then happy to pay my tax here again.
"Extradited for sex crimes" doesn't really answer the question if he has been charged with any crimes. And no, he has not.
He is just a suspect, and wanted for questioning.
Now I'm curious now. What kind of idea is it then?
Doesn't it seem strange that the content owners are the ones being asked that the content is in fact theirs?
The problem is that most companies doesn't like the US law, so they are leaving.
Wasn't that the entire point of this article?