Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:WHY!? (Score 1) 614

That's probably not the case. It seems like these days a presidential candidate is chosen for broad(ish) appeal, but the VP is chosen to be a party hard liner to galvanize the faithful voting blocks and keep the party legislators in line. See Biden, Cheney, Gore. I think Palin was a calculated choice to try to get a group of people, Tea Party, to vote Republican instead of Libertarian.

Comment: Re:Evanescent wave (Score 1) 55

by Shatrat (#43654069) Attached to: Los Alamos National Labs Has Working Hub-and-Spoke Quantum Network

You are overthinking it. If I wanted to tap someone's network, I'd find a splice case in the middle of nowhere and splice in a 90/10 splitter during some unrelated outage so it wouldn't be noticed. To the victim it would just look like a relatively poor splice on their OTDR readings.

Comment: Re:The ghost of of an evil monopoly (Score 1) 140

by Shatrat (#43641461) Attached to: Study: Limiting Bidding On Spectrum Could Cost Billions

the company currently known as at&t consists of all the baby bells that don't already belong to Verizon

Ah, well that's also not really true. Centurylink, Frontier, TDS, Windstream, Sprint, and others I'm probably forgetting are all still out there running ILEC markets. Not that I disagree with your conclusion, from a wholesale perspective I can assure you AT&T is even more disfunctional and apathetic than they are at the retail level.

Comment: Re:The ghost of of an evil monopoly (Score 1) 140

by Shatrat (#43602529) Attached to: Study: Limiting Bidding On Spectrum Could Cost Billions

AT&T didn't buy up baby bells. SBC bought up other baby bells and then also bought what was left of AT&T and took the name over. AT&T itself was withering away after the breakup. Both Verizon and what is now AT&T have their origins in local carriers, not long distance. Anyway, they're not evil. They're just fat and lazy and that makes everything more expensive for them as well.

Comment: Re:So we aren't going to be able to replace... (Score 1) 62

by Shatrat (#43589689) Attached to: Inventor of OpenFlow SDN Admits Most SDN Today Is Hype

Thanks for actually posting an intelligent comment. Everytime there's a story that involves technology I work with I realize how ignorant most of Slashdot really is.
The API I think is the key observation. Forget websites though, that's chump change.
SDN is actually really interesting for my industry, long haul fiber networks. Today we have multiple layers of equipment, the physical fiber plant, the DWDM layer, the OTN layer, the Sonet or Packet transport layer, the IP/MPLS layer. Today those layers don't talk to each other so all the configurations are manual and static. The hope is that SDN succeeds where GMPLS has sort of stalled. GMPLS is really only used in some proprietary network implementations, and not as an interface between different vendor equipment as it was envisioned.

Comment: Re:What?! (Score 1) 69

by Shatrat (#43561177) Attached to: CenturyLink Providing DoD's Equivalent of Internet2

Add up the channels in each direction? That sounds like router marketing math to me.
I'm referring to actual 50ghz spaced systems on the ITU grid which would theoretically allow 100 channels, but everyone skips a few to cut down on NLE.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/optical/ps5724/ps2006/datasheet_c78-598521.html
http://www.tellabs.com/products/7000/tlab7100nano.pdf
The Infinera is 25ghz spaced, and goes to 160 channels.
http://www.infinera.com/products/ILS.html

Comment: Re:Because users don't necessarily get that much (Score 1) 69

by Shatrat (#43555841) Attached to: CenturyLink Providing DoD's Equivalent of Internet2

100gig? I don't even know, those are the "call us for pricing" kinds of switches

I shouldn't give exact figures but I'm pretty familiar with 100Gig pricing. Let's just say, 100Gig short range optic = new motorcycle. 100Gig intermediate reach optic = new car. 100Gig DWDM optic = new luxury car.

Comment: Re:What?! (Score 1) 69

by Shatrat (#43555735) Attached to: CenturyLink Providing DoD's Equivalent of Internet2

Yes it exists, we are already deploying it across the network I work on. The technology you need for long haul 100G is 'Coherent' optics using advanced modulation such as DP-QPSK instead of the old on-off keying used by 10Gig and below. See here for a good example data sheet. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/optical/ps5724/ps2006/data_sheet_c78-713298.html

Comment: Re:I have CenturyLink (Score 1) 69

by Shatrat (#43555705) Attached to: CenturyLink Providing DoD's Equivalent of Internet2

If competitive carriers like CenturyLink had access to facilities

Centurylink is an Incumbent (ILEC), not a Competitive carrier (CLEC). They have CLEC business units and sales groups for inter-lata Long Distance type deals, such as the one in the article, but DSL, voice, T1s, those are all their bread and butter. And, they're still required to lease voice, T1, T3 and other standard services at standard tariffs. Citation needed on the 2005 thing, CLECs are alive and well and generally making more money than the ILECs.

Blessed is he who expects nothing, for he shall never be disappointed. -- Alexander Pope

Working...