Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: What can be done? It's obvious. (Score 3, Insightful) 515

by Scutter (#48581447) Attached to: Once Again, Baltimore Police Arrest a Person For Recording Them

People keep saying "fire the officers", but this should be a criminal matter. Tampering with evidence, violation of civil rights under color of law, etc. Fire them, jail them as provided by law, make the settlement come out of their pocket (or, perhaps, the pension fund) instead of making the taxpayers foot the bill. HOLD THEM PERSONALLY ACCOUNTABLE AND RESPONSIBLE. Then, and only then, will it stop.

Comment: Re:What's your suggestion for intelligence work? (Score 2) 504

by Scutter (#47939323) Attached to: Apple Will No Longer Unlock Most iPhones, iPads For Police

No, because I don't get my historical information from fictional films. I watched a fictional movie last year about giant robots landing on the moon but I didn't get upset at Hollywood for claiming that giant robots beat us there. Only a moron gets angry at a fiction writer for writing fiction. Now, if you had said "Ken Burns made a WW2 documentary and got the following facts wrong..." Then yes, I would say you had a legitimate gripe at Ken Burns (and not at "Hollywood"), but I would just tell you to stop watching Ken Burns films.

The whole argument that "Hollywood" always gets history wrong in favor of the Americans when making fictional films is just petty jingoistic whining. If it really bothers you that much, go make your own films and set the record straight.

Comment: Re:What spam calls? (Score 4, Insightful) 210

by Scutter (#47889211) Attached to: Turning the Tables On "Phone Tech Support" Scammers

Scammers, by definition, do not follow the law. What makes you think they'd concern themselves with something as petty as a Do No call law?

And yes, you should consider yourself lucky. These kinds of calls are becoming more frequent and MUCH more aggressive. I had one scammer call me back over a hundred times in one day when I hung up on him. I eventually just routed all incoming calls to my fax machine.

Comment: Re:No more "Cloud", please (Score 3, Interesting) 60

by Scutter (#47759733) Attached to: VMware Unveils Workplace Suite and NVIDIA Partnership For Chromebooks

HIPAA, PCI, Sarbanes Oxley, Et. al. I'm seeing more and more call to implement ways to control data in the age of bring-your-own-device and mobile workforces. If a company can let a user work from the coffee shop but still keep the actual data inside the datacenter, then a thin-client solution becomes more and more attractive.

Comment: Remember cable TV? (Score 1) 611

by Scutter (#47721089) Attached to: Study: Ad-Free Internet Would Cost Everyone $230-a-Year

When pay TV was first launched, it was with the promise of commercial-free content. That didn't last long. When satellite radio was launched, it was with the promise of commercial-free content. That didn't last long. Subscription-based streaming TV shows (like Hulu Plus)? That didn't last long.

Once you're used to paying extra for the service, the money grubbers will be back. It's inevitable.

Comment: Re:About a year late (Score 2) 215

by Scutter (#47704549) Attached to: New HP Laptop Would Mean Windows at Chromebook Prices

I will sacrifice storage for RAM any day of the week and twice on Sunday. I cannot fathom why portables continue to be shafted with an anaemic 2GB (4 if you're very lucky) of RAM. Memory isn't that expensive these days, but holy crap does the OS run better with 6 or 8GB.

My last one was an 11.1" netbook with 8GB. I bought it because it was the only netbook with 8GB, which meant I could run Windows 7 and also one or more applications AT THE SAME TIME!. It has served me far better than any 15" laptop I ever had. It's going to suck trying to find an adequate replacement when this one croaks.

Comment: Re:What is a troll? (Score 1) 382

by Scutter (#47695345) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Would You Pay For Websites Without Trolls?

If they can followup and support their arguments logically, then they're either not a troll or it doesn't matter.

Ok, so a troll always presents an argument? They never just "ask an innocent question"? And, by your definition, all posters must post at least twice since they must "follow up" or they're automatically a troll. Do you see why it's so hard to create a 100% black-and-white set of rules that is always effective in identifying a troll? You've presented one possible identifier of a troll but there are dozens or even thousands of ways that someone can troll.

Keep your boss's boss off your boss's back.

Working...