Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?

Comment: Harmful to minors? Is it tubgirl? (Score 2, Insightful) 489

by Screaming Harlot (#14946515) Attached to: Senators Renew Call for .XXX Domain
If the definition requires that a site "has as its principal or primary business the making available of material that is harmful to minors," many (myself included) might argue that most pr0n sites should be held exempt. I refuse to believe that viewing naked bodies (solo or action) is inherently 'harmful to minors,' especially when 'minors' includes such pr0n-consuming demographics as 17-year-old boys.

Dynamically binding, you realize the magic. Statically binding, you see only the hierarchy.