Comment: Re:Then why is it still called LibreOffice? (Score 1) 317
Comment: Re:Stand up, people! (Score 1) 439
Comment: Re:Stand up, people! (Score 2) 439
Comment: Re:Where's the obstruction of justice charge? (Score 0) 643
Comment: Re:Sounds Like a Hoax Right Up Until You Read the (Score 0) 362
Comment: Re:Nginx is primarily a cache engine (Score 2) 340
Comment: Re:Linksys E3000 (Score 1) 334
Comment: Re:Yeah, we could do that, or... (Score 2) 101
I'm always amazed when Anonymous Coward is able to solve, by thought alone, problems that all of NASA is only able to solve by tedious experimentation, and the collection and analysis of empirical data.
Comment: Re:No one wants it? (Score 1) 392
I totally agree with you there, that's the main reason I've never done more than glance at Objective-C.
I doubt you've even glanced at it, else you'd realize it's not a proprietary language controlled and distributed by one company, but as open as C, upon which it is built. Used extensively by and controlled by are not the same thing. (Admittedly, NeXT tried to make the Obj-C front end proprietary, but Stallman sicced his hippy lawyers on them to make sure it stayed GPLed). And I think you're doing yourself a disservice by not exploring it a bit, at least enough to make informed comments in public about it. I immediately found it very expressive and flexible, akin to Python, though sometimes a bit verbose.