Slashdot stories can be listened to in audio form via an RSS feed, as read by our own robotic overlord.


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:God Republicans are Stupid (Score 0) 96

by Sarius64 (#49181837) Attached to: The Mexican Drug Cartels' Involuntary IT Guy

Because everyone designated Secretary of State should be able to misplace $6 billion or so.

from the citation:

Clinton has not described her motivation for using a private email account —, which traced back to her own private email server registered under an apparent pseudonym — for official State Department business.

So you're saying it's proper for the third ranking member of the U.S. Government to conduct their office via private e-mail servers?


The New York Times reported Monday that Clinton exclusively used a personal email account it did not specify to conduct State Department business. The disclosure raised questions about whether she took actions to preserve copies of her old work-related emails, as required by the Federal Records Act. A Clinton spokesman, Nick Merrill, told the newspaper that Clinton complied with the letter and spirit of the law because her advisers reviewed tens of thousands of pages of her personal emails to decide which ones to turn over to the State Department after the agency asked for them.

So, not only can you not read, you allow the "Clinton advisers" to now be the arbiters of Federal law.

Comment: Re:Not a fucking chance. (Score 1) 369

by Sarius64 (#49088127) Attached to: Two New Male Birth Control Chemicals In Advanced Stages

1. Again, you accuse a victim for not wading instantly through mounds of paternity law when the fraud is exacted against them (me). Further evidence the you would rather ruin someone's professional, personal, and legal standing than admit that women are enabled to commit fraud against men by most current paternity laws around the world. Counts as one instance of you advocating illegal activity from my POV. I particularly liked the part where you automatically assumed I would have sex with this person whatsoever and then dictate to me how I must conduct myself intimately.

2. Show me a single /. thread that survives its plan once the comments start?

3. I haven't a clue what a SJW is, or the depression comments concern. Maybe you could advocate 'people' instead of LGBTt's because the other 95% + of people tire of your bullshit.

Comment: Re:Not a fucking chance. (Score 1) 369

by Sarius64 (#49082749) Attached to: Two New Male Birth Control Chemicals In Advanced Stages

Again, I and plenty of others have posted citations of paternity fraud throughout the thread. It takes less than 5 seconds to make the shortest of google queries about the subject. Someone in most European countries and a large majority of states can simply put my name on paper and I am now a father. This recently happened to me, even though I was in another country for the conception (4,000+ miles away), and the lady said she just felt like protecting her child instead of labeling the correct father, who makes much less money than me. My wife of 30+ years did find it interesting to receive the summons, though.

This is the law in California, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany. If you wish to find more modern locations than these I'd love to hear your analogies. Somehow, I think you continue to excuse any sort of illegal activity for your social justice activism.

Due to lack of disk space, this fortune database has been discontinued.