Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:OPT OUT (Score 5, Funny) 564

by Salgak1 (#39043907) Attached to: Female Passengers Say They Were Targeted For TSA Body Scanners

Always remember to give the officer doing the pat-down your best sex-offender-smirk and remark that you "always stand at attention for a man in uniform"... The situation is not actually winnable in any useful way; but if the rentacop goes home feeling as though their soul is soiled, you've done your part.

Anyone remember the Movie "When Harry Met Sally" ??? Specifically, the cafeteria scene where Meg Ryan fakes an orgasm ?? Several of us did that to the TSA Goons on our most recent flight. One guy even offered a tip for getting felt up "so well". . . . Needless to say, the TSA goons were more than a little discomfitted, and the people in line behind each of us were basically LMFAO. . . . Laughter IS the best weapon against officious busybodies. . .

Comment: Re:Marketing department (Score 1) 464

by Salgak1 (#39015181) Attached to: Dealing With an Overly-Restrictive Intellectual Property Policy?

After all, they were paying me to engineer and implement systems, not write lyrics or short stories.

Unless they're looking for a liaison between the engineering and marketing departments. If you can write short stories, you can learn to write ad copy. If you can write lyrics, you can learn to write jingles.

And if they wanted me to add those skills to my job description, I would. For an additional price, of course (which may or may not be in dollars...)

Comment: Re:Read things before you sign them. (Score 1) 464

by Salgak1 (#39013837) Attached to: Dealing With an Overly-Restrictive Intellectual Property Policy?
Agreed. I faced this several years ago: the company I worked for had a similar policy. But when I signed on, I negotiated a standing exemption for my songs and my fiction: when posed reasonably ( and a few previous samples of each provided), they had no problem exempting them. After all, they were paying me to engineer and implement systems, not write lyrics or short stories. . .

Comment: Re:Thus the cycle repeats (Score 1) 191

by Salgak1 (#39007061) Attached to: NASA To Drastically Cut Mars Mission Funding
You need to look a little harder at the science spinoffs. Better electronics, better medicine and medical sensors, improved weather reporting and prediction, orbital imaging for finding previously undiscovered natural resources, improved materials. . . . And that was all of thirty seconds review of stuff I personally know about the spinoffs. It's not ALL Tang. . . (Grin)

Comment: Re:Kickstarter (Score 1) 191

by Salgak1 (#39006633) Attached to: NASA To Drastically Cut Mars Mission Funding
I'd invest. Hell, that was the plan of an organization ~10 or so years ago: they were giving presentations at SF Cons. (Cannot remember their name: something Greek mythology-related as I recall. . .) They expected their booster and lander, etc, would be FESTOONED with supporter logos. The model seems to work for NASCAR. . .

Comment: Re:What if voting was compulsory? (Score 2) 48

. . .after which, someone will discover a conspiracy where someone is handing out rigged coins for voter coin flips.

My solution: EVERY ballot has a "none of the above" choice. If NOTA gets more than a given percentage (say, 20-30%), ALL the candidates lose, and new candidates would have to run. . .

Comment: Re:Speak for yourself (Score 1) 583

by Salgak1 (#38921621) Attached to: When it comes to U.S. colonies on the moon ...
Actually. that's incorrect. For 2004 (the year whose data I see in a convenient bar graph....), the top 10% pays ~68% of all taxes, but earns ~44% of all income. The top 5% pays 57% for 38% of the income, and the dreaded 1% pays 37% of the taxes for 19% of all the income. Even at the top 25%, in toto, are paying 85% of the taxes, for 66% of the total income. Oddly enough, the lowest 50% of earners earn 13% of the total income, but pay merely 3% of the taxes. Sounds like someone isn't paying their "fair share", and it's not "the rich". . .

Comment: Re:Then we must live forever (Score 1) 474

by Salgak1 (#38884225) Attached to: Trials and Errors: Why Science Is Failing Us
Are you sure of that? Last century's "magic" or "psychic powers" are now straightforward engineering. Flight, for example, does NOT require a ring or potion or carpet:it requires an aircraft. What we used to call "clairvoyance" or "remote viewing".... is now Video. Assuming we survive as a species, the maintenance of consciousness, memory, and personality outside of the original biological platform should a standard exercise, likely within a century. If you listen to Ray Kurzweil, anywhere from 17 to 33 years off...

"Everyone is entitled to an *informed* opinion." -- Harlan Ellison

Working...