Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Movies are real! (Score 1) 743

by Cederic (#43796123) Attached to: House Bill Would Mandate Smart Gun Tech By U.S. Manufacturers

. It must be serviceable and ready to defend my home on a moment's notice.

Oooh, I know that feeling. I have the same approach to my back door lock. Admittedly I forgot to use it yesterday and the cats came in and out all day while I was at work, but at least I have one, and it works.

Seriously, just where the fuck do you live? Aleppo?

"defend my home". Sure. Grow some fucking balls.

Comment: Re:I would love it if (Score 1) 201

Given the millions of people that already wear corrective spectacles, the number of people that wear sunglasses and the number of people stupid enough to think that all of them are trying to record their cock in a bathroom, I think you're safe.

If not, use the existing laws on assault, or just shoot the person that punched you. Isn't that the American way?

People ALREADY have cameras on them all the time. They can ALREADY record live video with head mounted cameras, and youtube has a fuckload of content recorded in that manner.

Stop being a paranoid cock.

Comment: Re:What? Again? (Score 1) 807

by Cederic (#43756303) Attached to: Rice Professor Predicts Humans Out of Work In 30 Years

Which is clearly just shit.

Support a family in a house with no central heating, one TV, no computers, no internet access, a single small radio, possibly a record player, a hoover and a cooker but no microwave, no dishwasher. Dress the children in second-hand clothing. Eat out once a month. Have one car in the family, or none if you live outside of the US.

Tell me you still need two parents working? Or did you want to enjoy those productivity gains of technology?

Comment: Re:Short yellow lights are a safety hazard (Score 1) 506

You want to tell me, a car rental agency can make a contract to cover my traffic bills/tickets? Sorry, under european law this idea is not only rediculous but laughable

Really? Fascinating. Good luck renting a car in the UK where not only will the rental company inform you that you will be charged for all bills/tickets, but that in response to any speeding notices you will be named as the offending driver.

Think you're safe because you live in another part of Europe? Welcome to the (fucked up stupid illogical and abused) European Arrest Warrant.

Living in Europe does not excuse you from obeying traffic laws.

Comment: Re:well... (Score 1) 985

by Cederic (#43733747) Attached to: NTSB Recommends Lower Drunk Driving Threshold Nationwide: 0.05 BAC

Wtf does drink-driving have to do with bars?

You can drink alcohol outside of a bar.
You can drink alcohol in a bar without driving there or back.
You can drink in a bar without consuming alcohol.

What you can't do legally is get drunk then cause a serious danger to yourself and other road users through use of a motorised vehicle.

Is that a problem for you?

Comment: Re:Commercial drivers are already limited to 0.02 (Score 1) 985

by Cederic (#43733723) Attached to: NTSB Recommends Lower Drunk Driving Threshold Nationwide: 0.05 BAC

We'd gain better observance of the law from people that think, "I can have one and I'll be fine" then end up having 2-3 and justify it with "Well, I started an hour ago so the first one's worn off now".

That may not be how you do it, but sadly other people do.

Comment: Re:The author has the RAW file. Case closed (Score 1) 181

by Cederic (#43723303) Attached to: World Press Photo Winner Accused of Photoshopping

Doesn't Adobe allow you to convert your RAW to DNG? Will that also convert your JPGs to DNG?

Some cameras produce DNG as their RAW format, so it must count. It's just going to look a bit shitty as it came from a JPG.

(For what it's worth, I publish 100% quality JPGs. They're not as good as RAWs, but for most uses they're pretty adequate)

Comment: Re:It DOES look fake (Score 1) 181

by Cederic (#43723205) Attached to: World Press Photo Winner Accused of Photoshopping

Silly question: How do you do multiple conversions from RAW? Is that an embedded JPG within the RAW file?

Just that Lightroom just overwrites the previous JPG for me, replacing the whole file rather than updating it. I don't use embedded JPGs though, I just publish when needed.

My RAW files on the other hand will show multiple edits on multiple days. I take the photo, I load it into Lightroom (which changes it), I apply my own changes, I may come back another day and apply other changes. I may make a virtual copy so that I can have two different photographs from the same RAW (e.g. different crops, B&W vs Colour, different contrast curvers, etc).

No idea how any of that impacts the XMP data though :)

"And do you think (fop that I am) that I could be the Scarlet Pumpernickel?" -- Looney Tunes, The Scarlet Pumpernickel (1950, Chuck Jones)

Working...