Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Who would you be doing this for? (Score 4, Interesting) 700

by Sad Loser (#48976383) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Pros and Cons of Homeschooling?

Who would you be doing this for? The child or the parent?

As a parent I taught my kids to read before they went to school, and their times tables before they were 8. I think this was helpful but I will never know.

Some of my neices and nephews have been home schooled out of necessity - living in isolated African areas who have gone to normal school age 13. They have integrated well mostly and one of them was Head Boy at his school.
What their parents did say is that a lot of the home schooling material is produced for children who are being home schooled to ensure that they don't learn some things. Evolution and certain facts of life mainly. Suspect it might be a bit light be a bit light on Climate Change as well!

My vote is to send to normal school and supplement with targeted extra help and trips to stimulating places. My kids now think it was really cool I took them to Bletchley Park before it was full of Benedict Cumberbatch etc !

One point I would make is that because of the internet, kids now learn at least as much from each other as they do from adults. They no longer get one single version of the truth, and the sooner they learn to sort the wheat from the chaff, the better.

I would have to ask - Is there another (?work-related) reason that your partner wants to do this?

Comment: Re:illogical captain (Score 5, Interesting) 937

by Sad Loser (#47899229) Attached to: Why Atheists Need Captain Kirk

I think the point is that Kirk presents the human-acceptable side of hard science.
We are different Myers-Briggs types, and most people don't think, and that is why all our politicians are non-scientists. There are a lot of sheep out there who just want a quiet life and if going to Church on Sundays is part of that, well so be it.

Is this about looking for a moral framework or at least some reference points, if not a full 10 commandments.
A lot more peole than atheists tacitly know that God doesn't exist, but they want something to believe in.

I reckon Christopher Hitchens made a pretty good job in his own way:

“Beware the irrational, however seductive.
Shun the 'transcendent' and all who invite you to subordinate or annihilate yourself.
Distrust compassion; prefer dignity for yourself and others.
Don't be afraid to be thought arrogant or selfish.
Picture all experts as if they were mammals.
Never be a spectator of unfairness or stupidity.
Seek out argument and disputation for their own sake; the grave will supply plenty of time for silence.
Suspect your own motives, and all excuses.
Do not live for others any more than you would expect others to live for you.”

Comment: maybe it has just moved out of university (Score 4, Informative) 203

by Sad Loser (#47832723) Attached to: Is There a Creativity Deficit In Science?

I work in biomedical research and yes - a lot of money is diverted into research with incremental benefits - me-too drugs.

remember that big pharma spend more on marketing than on research.

The interesting stuff has effectively been outsourced to start-ups that find compounds, do some basic work and then sell to a pharma to commercialise. That way at least the people doing the creating get some benefit.

What hasn't happened in its stead is any good research at delivering and applying a lot of the knowledge/ practice we do have, and this is where we could get a lot of bang for our buck and we could be a lot more creative - just by doing what we know works correctly.
This is particularly true in fields where there is not currently much research (because there is no big drugs market)

Comment: Re:Why ODF? (Score 1) 164

you need someone like Francis Maude who is a politician who just wants to get things done and doesn't want the limelight.

while the coalition government has been treading water for the last 4 years he has been getting on, quietly dismantling the vast organisational structures that had built up over the previous 10 years.

On the face of it a small triumph, but it will pull the rug from under a company that has gone from being an innovator to using its market position to stifle innovation and protect its cash cow

There are some very smart people in the Cabinet Office digital strategy group and this is good work that is clearly in the UK's interests.
I am sure that Tesla would be pleased to have Francis Maude review the automotive dealerships

Comment: Re:Recruiting policy (Score 2) 589

by Sad Loser (#46926643) Attached to: Microsoft Cheaper To Use Than Open Source Software, UK CIO Says
absolutely right
same goes for health
however the common theme is that the way that these organisations work is that there is no structure to pay competent FOSS IT people 50-60k a year to administer the network.

It therefore seems 'cheaper' to pay for Microsoft products and to have a bunch of low grade IT staff who can only cope with Microsoft products on 25-30k a year who end up running the helldesk, which casues more unhappiness.

IT staff are like classic cars. the cheapest classic car will always work out the most expensive.

Comment: Organisational culture (Score 1) 164

by Sad Loser (#46593077) Attached to: Peter Molyneux: Working For Microsoft Is Like Taking Antidepressants

it seems that the piece is about organisational culture and how you preserve a high functioning development team in an a large organisation that becomes too focussed on bottom line and not enough on their customers and growth.

This must be a common problem for IT companies. do you need skunkworks? at the same time there is a piece in the news at the moment about how Jobs slavedrove the iphone team into spectacular creativity. maybe it only works when the driving force is as creative as the people being driven?

it is a bit unfortunate that most of the /. is 'my pain/depression/ side effects is bigger than yours' cock measuring, as it makes it look like people who contribute to /. are very concrete, limited and self-centred, which I find hard to believe.

Comment: methinks he doth protest too much (Score -1, Flamebait) 525

by Sad Loser (#43323147) Attached to: Fighting TSA Harassment of Disabled Travelers

IANAL but IAAD and there are things in this story that sound a bit odd, and looking at his web page it sounds like he has a bit of an agenda
it sounds like he has this condition

I am cynical about this situation from experience. Like the most anti-gay republican senators, the most vocal 'disabled' people I have met have turned out to have an interesting secret - in their case some a complete absence of disease (including one member of a paralympic team!).
For the avoidance of doubt, I am not suggesting that this man has anything other than a genuine neurological condition. Just sayin'

Comment: Re:More autism or more diagnosis? (Score 1) 398

by Sad Loser (#39517485) Attached to: CDC Reports 1 In 88 Children Now Affected With Autism In the US
I think this is the key to it.
In the UK having your child labelled as 'autistic' or 'autism spectrum'
a) is more socially acceptable than just being labelled as 'slow' (yes I know this is wrong but this is just the way it is) whereas with autism they have a [poorly defined] disease, which is seen as 'an act of God'
b) opens the door to a lot more state benefits (=money) and extra teaching at school (schools like having more teachers), as the child is counted as being 'disabled'.

While I am glad that more kids are being picked up and are being better supported, I am sure that part of this is the creeping medicalisation of normal human variation, and (even as a doctor) this is not a good thing

Comment: Re:I have an organ donor card... (Score 5, Insightful) 516

by Sad Loser (#39320439) Attached to: When Are You Dead?
IAAD and sometimes diagnose brain death - a lot of this academic debate ends up just scaring people or firing up various religious groups who have a problem with donation (but often have less of a problem with receiving donated organs).

It is good to have this debate, but like abortion, this is an area where people who deal with the messy situations that life provides should get to drive the policy, rather than any particularly flavour of god-botherers.

Comment: Agreed (Score 1) 127

by Sad Loser (#36985178) Attached to: UK Health Service Fears Huge Legal Fight Over Unwanted Contracts

digital radiology works, but is generally a standalone system and poorly integrated.

GP to GP transfers - well that would have happened anyway.

Lorenzo is totally dead in the water. Involved in product testing of modules in last 3/12 - doesn't even get to first base. hopelessly broken.

Yes CERNER Millennium works, but is a maladapted dinosaur, with the same evolutionary potential.

Comment: Re:related? (Score 4, Insightful) 127

by Sad Loser (#36983972) Attached to: UK Health Service Fears Huge Legal Fight Over Unwanted Contracts

I am a senior doctor in the NHS and am one of many trying to unravel some of this unholy mess to work out which bits are workable.

The obvious stuff - own a basic infrastructure, use open standards, manage contracts tightly and locally, encourage a diverse IT culture within and outside hospitals and use competition to drive down price and drive up performance - this just didn't happen. As the parent says - a centralised system specified by obsessive compulsive people who don't touch patients and with an irresistible urge to gold plate everything.

The NHS doesn't even own the N3 network - it rents it off BT.

We are tied down with a vast number of closed systems that will cause untold unhappiness, waste and frustration in years to come - my hospital is about to go live with CERNER, which has a Windows 3.1/ 'visual basic by a first year programmer' look and feel. It takes >30 seconds to authenticate every time you want to do anything (often)! this alone will steal many hours of medical and nursing time waiting.

They as the parent says, the contracts were poorly specified, carved up by the usual management consultancy clowns and their mates, and then just left to fester.

Unfortunately, the people running the whole thing were not equipped with the mental or managerial experience to make it work. There was one head of IT, Richard Grainger, who might have had a chance at doing it properly from the off, but was brought in too late when the carve up had taken place, and ran away as fast as he could. The rest is history.

What they could have done differently?
1. read ' the mythical man month'
2. pay someone to re-engineer VISTA in c++/ c# / java
3. get some people in who are successful doctors, not just the nearest beardy muppet who doesn't want to touch patients any more.


Comment: Re:Makes a lot of sense (Score 1) 254

by Sad Loser (#36442070) Attached to: Federally-Mandated Medical Coding Gums Up IT Ops
IAAMD, also national data representative for medical college.

this is absolutely right
big taxonomies are are designed by people who don't use them. There is a degree of prick measuring - 'my taxonomy is bigger than yours'
Silly to go to ICD10 when that's already out of date and SNOMED is available.

In the long term, complete EPR with native SNOMED coding is the way to go, but in the meantime give me a small taxonomy with minimal inter-coder variation.

If you think the system is working, ask someone who's waiting for a prompt.