"Well, if you can make random observations that I find useless, I sure can make random statements that you may find useless. Like this."
Okay. I thought you wanted to have a reasonable discussion. But you've been trying to distort it into some kind of weird pseudo-logical argument of some kind, without presenting any actual facts or evidence. In one breath you're trying to make it into a logical argument, in the next you try to "refute" my evidence by simply saying it's wrong, and in the next you're playing the mind-reading game... and behind it all you haven't presented a shred of evidence to back up what is indeed a rather outrageous claim, given the historical evidence.
Nice trolling, if that's what you intended. But whether you intended it or not, that's what you're doing and I have no need to waste more time here.