Having a solid Contributor License Agreement process in place would probably be a good idea. That way, it's clear who owns the code that comes in and encourages people to contribute while defining a (necessary evil) process for doing so. You'll lose random passers-by, but just one passer-by who gets litigious could be more of a headache than it's worth.
The manufacturer, so that it breaks, and we have a reason to go buy another expensive one or get it repaired.
Collusion, I tell ya!
And now, if Twitter wants to, it can make Turkey play whack-a-mole by moving IPs every time one gets blocked...
So this is actually a test of the one of the attractive principles of Bitcoin: no one can separate you from your money, assuming that you control your private keys. Karpeles isn't a complete idiot, so I'm certain the keys to what balance he himself maintains are safely stored somewhere only he knows (brain wallet?). So, assuming that he has substantial holdings in bitcoin, then what good does the asset freeze do? He is free to spend bitcoin, unless the asset freeze also prevents businesses from accepting money of any kind from him.
Same holds for the two companies, but they are much more likely to have a larger USD balance that is actually affected by the freeze.
Methinks if Mr. Hiroshima had the funds available, or pro-bono lawyer stepped in, there's grounds for a lawsuit against at least PayPal if not also GoDaddy.
I think it's a bit of an extension to say that this law does anything more than extend harassment laws to specifically prohibit use of a drone to harass someone.
While you and I may consider advertisements to often be harassing, a court may not!
IMO, the only things that Bazaar has up on Git these days is released, official support for Windows and thus better GUIs all around for all platforms. Git is still technically a pre-release for Windows. Bazaar is also purportedly better for binary files than Git, and allows downloads from any point in the history (instead of Git requiring that you download the whole repository history).
All of this has happened before, and all of this will happen again.
At least this time it's of a currency worth very, very little, so losses aren't that great and there are even more great minds thinking about how to solve cryptocurrency security problems. The end-user human will always be the weakest link, and the trust that the end user places on others always the most vulnerable part.
Blame government for treating Bitcoin as a commodity instead of as a currency
It's not a currency, you fucking retard. It is a commodity. The fact that it can lose--what are we at now--66% of it's value overnight pretty much makes it clear it isn't money, but rather a security. And a very volatile one at that.
Let's talk Greeks, Cypriots, Argentinians, Zimbabweans, and some others about currency value changes overnight.
There are many, many reasons why these silly "digital currencies" won't translate to real life.
I can burn less than 10 calories to add 10 times as many Bitcoin to the world.
How many calories do I have to burn to divide a piece of gold into 10?
No, I believe that people who are not good at what they do should lose their job.