Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Here is the actual report (Score 2) 380 380

Here is the actual report: http://www.aptiquant.com/IQ-Browser-AptiQuant-2011.pdf

Yes, the whole thing is a PR stunt. So what. It made me smile ;)

The summary is a summary of a summary. Figure 2 in the original report is much more informative. The majority of the highest scoring people use Firefox (35%) or Chrome (20%). The majority of the lowest scoring people use IE7 (35%) or IE9 (20%). Opera and ChromeFrame are not used by people scoring lower than average.

As for correlations I would guess the following:

IE7 -> low score.
Firefox -> average to high score.
Opera and ChromeFrame and Camino -> high score.
Safari -> not much correlation at all.
Other IEs -> not much correlation, tendency to lower scores.

Anyways, it's nothing but a joke.

Comment Re:How about... (Score 1) 325 325

Hey I didn't call them a thread per se! But in the special case of underground opposition in a totalitarian state (which is a valid use scenario for freenet et al.) it might be wise to *not* directly disclose your buddies by means of a simple text file. It would be sufficient, though, to share a list of trusted foreign peers.

The only point I want to make is that you should be aware of your tool's inherent limits. Or blatnly said: False anonymity is worse then no anonymity.

Comment How about... (Score 2, Informative) 325 325

freenet (there is a dark net mode since version 7).

I remember people arguing dark mode being an anonymity thread itself. I case you computer is seized you and your 'friends' are immediately identified as part the of same conspirative group (based on client's friend list). Might rather be a problem in totalitarian systems where being suspicious is enough to face personal detriment (no pun intended).

Comment Re:It was a nightmare for regular users in 2000... (Score 1) 238 238

Thumbs up! Yea I was deflowerd by debian as well :) must have been around 1995, still in high school.
Well I checked the facts. Gentoo was released 2002 so I must have switched a bit later...

I'm kind of peeved that you can't switch from x86 to amd64

That also got me thinking. On Gentoo it seems to be possible to cross-re-compile the whole system and finally switch gcc to 64 bit. We'll see. Until now I didn't feel the need for 4 gigs of ram ;) No idea about debian, sorry.

Comment Re:It was a nightmare for regular users in 2000... (Score 4, Insightful) 238 238

You say it, in 2000 I set up a Gentoo system on one of those early Pentium III Notebooks. Yes, sure, it took me a couple of hours. But guess what, I still use it every day, exclusively. Just copied it from box to box over the years. So I'd say that time was quite a good investment ;)

"Pok pok pok, P'kok!" -- Superchicken

Working...