So much this.
So much this.
I have yet to see a legit security firm make any statement on this,.
Considering the person discovered this was 'italian' and called it a 'wopbot' I call Hoax.
Considering the great number of regular variables in our ocean it's not acceptable to state the water was higher or not. To claim it is because of 'global warming' is a fine collection of bovine excrement.
Average water levels higher? Try the millions of tonnage of displacement on our oceans by shipping, cruise ships and the like. Maybe. localized Gravitational anomalies perhaps ( Hint: our '1G' is an average that varies, it's not absolute. )
There is so much about our earth we don't know. Trying to say an ocean is a few inches higher is laughable at best. You can measure the ocean anytime you want and only measure during your high tides or whatever. It's 'Confirmation Bias' at it's worst. We don't know how the Earth works well enough, and all this green crap could actually be making it worse.
The whole concept of carbon credits is tantamount to profiteering, scaremongering and a form of terrorism all it's own.
I only hope some day all the chicken littles that bought into this shceme will come to their senses and formal charges are brought against the perpetrators for crimes against humanity.
In respect to this argument, the article posted by OP has it dead on, and you are dead wrong.
Sandy did more damage because people build their houses and boardwalks out of wood on sand bars and low lying coastal areas. The 'raised sea-level' was called 'storm surge', which depending on the tide, can be significantly higher or lower when it makes landfall. Factors like the slope of the seabed coming to the shore play a role also.
The chicken-littles of the 'scientific' community are butt-hurt because they had one of their doom-rattles taken from them.
Except the number of Hurricanes actually HITTING the U.S. has dwindled significantly in the last couple years. The one or two that do get through hit in more sensitive areas not prepared for it.
Every year the NOAA has pronounced a more severe storm season that's whimpered despite naming storms they wouldn't have even considered 10 years ago. I know, because I have been watching.
You are correct that the use of the Internet, in and of itself will not create qualifications.
But having access to it and properly directed they will be be far better in the IT industry than their peers that didn't have the access.
You can't argue with results.
Don't be so sure.
All my younger kids cannot wait until they are old enough to get a facebook account, and my oldest three that do have one are on it constantly.
Chances are very high that lack of facebook consumption by kids is limited by very paranoid parents that are crippling their future in any tech field by not allowing regular access to the Internet.
" Kids, upon the whole, do not use Facebook. "
The loss of money is still the involvement of money.
Wish I could +1 this.
Dewd, this isn't 4chan.
A entire car line was recalled for catching fire for no reason earlier last year. People got in hi-speed wrecks and caused fires, happening to be in a Tesla. The latter gets coverage, the former gets hardly any. No spin from what I can see here, just a disproportionate coverage on a car that's already in the spotlight.
What about genetic abnormalities? XXY? XYY? What about those who have Androgen insensitivity syndrome, where they exhibit superficially female organs and female secondary sex characteristics, but are genetically male?
Additionally, you've also mistaken sex for gender, which is a longer post that I'm too lazy to write.
What's to stop the thieves from just killing the owner outright so it can't be reported before the SIM is changed?
But you do use more power than if you used network cables. I think that's what he was getting at.
You can do this in a number of ways. IBM chose to do all of them. Why do you find that funny? -- D. Taylor, Computer Science 350