Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:How can they tell... (Score 1) 746

by ultranova (#30205046) Attached to: New Research Forecasts Global 6C Increase By End of Century

And when we recently saw snow in India, how can anyone take a 6oC *rise* seriously.

Seeing how Himalaya (parts of it, anyway) is in India, I fail to see much shocking in this.

Some places are getting hotter, some are getting colder, nature will adjust itself as always.

Indeed. And that means that previously fertile areas will dry out as climate patterns shift, infrastructure designed for warm/cold climate will become unsuitable for the new conditions, and coastal areas - which are the most heavily-populated pretty much everywhere - flood as the sea level rises due to melting icecaps and expanding (heat expansion) water.

It's not that global warming spells the end of our planet, biosphere, human race or even human civilization; in fact we could even conceivably end up benefiting in the long run. It's simply that the cleanup required to adapt our societies to their new surroundings will be massive, and that makes them expensive. And of course the societies which can't perform them fast enough due to political or resource issues will end up having massive problems, possibly leading to mass deaths and major wars.

Comment: Re:Not interested in Cloud Computing (Score 1) 155

by DragonWriter (#30204994) Attached to: Chrome OS and Android "Will Likely Converge" In the Future

If the Chrome OS is only an access point into a Google (or other) cloud then it is of no interest to me and shouldn't be of interest to anyone else.

Its not.

Its primarily designed as an interface into remotely hosted applications (though supporting applications that can run in an "offline mode" is a key feature) using web standards, but cloud computing (server abstraction and dynamic provisioning) have little to do with that except that it can provide a convenient platform for web apps, and the parts of "cloud computing" (really, just remote application hosting, which was around long before cloud computing) that Slashdotters tend to complain about ("ZOMG! I can't control my own data!") have even less to do with it, since nothing stops the apps you use on your Chrome OS device from being hosted on the inexpensive Linux-based server you've got plugged into your home router.

About the only thing either of those have to do with Google Chrome OS is that some aspects of Chrome OS will leverage facilities on Google's cloud, and that Google of course hopes that beyond that, Chrome OS users will find it a convenient platform for using Google's existing cloud-based apps. But its an open source project, so the first of those things can be replaced, and you are no more forced to use Google's other cloud apps with Chrome OS than you are with the existing Chrome browser.

Comment: Re:Link to Amended ABSTRACT is Wrong (Score 1) 91

by PPH (#30204964) Attached to: Amazon Scores Gift-Delivery Patent

The PDF linked by the submitter is the amended Abstract. What legal weight does the Abstract have? NONE.

So, essentially, the submitter has tried to claim that the attorney's fixing the length of the abstract, which bears no legal weight whatsoever and is merely for use in searching patent databases, somehow solves any question of patentability and novelty. And that's just wrong, and stupid.

Why shouldn't the USPTO judge patent applications based upon the abstract as well as the claims? Since the abstract is used for the purpose of performing preliminary searches of patents, poorly worded abstracts, or those that don't properly summarize the patent claims should be a basis for denial. Polluting the patent database with misleading data is one thing that the examiners should be taking into account.

Comment: 3D (Score 5, Informative) 143

by sopssa (#29393331) Attached to: Panasonic 3D TV Does Not Disappoint

This all 3D-to-the-eyes is an old trick, but over the past year I've started to think that now theres actually good technology available for it.

I purchased myself the NVIDIA 3D Vision and played with it on various games. My favourite game for the past year has been left4dead and the 3D effect on it is really outstanding - everything looks so much scarier and you actually feel like being there.

The old cheap tricks are quite obsolote now as tech has improvent. But the future of gaming and movies surely is in this 3D and "be there" experience. Even MS and Sony have admitted that just pushing megapixels and polygony amount isn't the best thing, as they're at their maximum already anyway. We always see these things in movies, but the technology isn't really far from there now.

Now the only thing is about making it convenient for end users.

Comment: Re:Want 64+core SMP systems? Intel Nehalem-EX in 2 (Score 1) 146

by raftpeople (#29393255) Attached to: Oracle To Increase Investment In SPARC and Solaris
I generally agree. The writing is and has been on the wall since intel got their act together:
1) intel is winning due to volume and execution
2) there is room for other players in other niches (large=IBM Power, small=ARM, etc.)

The advantage Power7 will still have over intel cpu's is that they are designed for large scale SMP, intel will still not be able to touch Power7 in 32 and 64 proc systems.

Comment: Re:I don't get whats so shady about it. (Score 1) 228

by Ironica (#29393247) Attached to: EA Comes Under Fire for Shady PR Stunts

I only consider Bribery truly immoral if its to commit an immoral act. To write? Writing isn't immoral under any circumstances, you can write as much as you bloody want and it won't hurt anyone physically, and if its hurts them in any other regard its their own fault.

So if someone writes something libelous against me, it's my own fault if it causes me to lose my job or my spouse or my life?

I think you underestimate the power of the written word.

Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes. -- Dr. Warren Jackson, Director, UTCS