Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:Just go away Apple! (Score 1) 316

by Radiophobic (#36956362) Attached to: Apple Blocks Sale of Galaxy Tab 10.1 In Australia
Certainly not innovative. However ipad is a decent product, as evidenced by the fact that none of the competing tablets seem to give users as good an experience. The iphone is good too; it took over two years before someone had made a decent competing smartphone. Google owns this market now, (completely justified, android is an awesome phone OS). I doubt android would be as good as it is now if it wasn't for the fact that they needed to reach the bar that had been raised by the iphone.

Comment: Re:Not until Google+ allows pseudonyms (Score 1) 456

by Radiophobic (#36879938) Attached to: Is Twitter Rendered Obsolete By Google+?
There are plenty of places to use the internet and remain anonymous. Google+ is letting people know that for now, their social network is not one of them. Most people who use social networks use their real name anyway. Google+ might loose out on the interest of the fringe few who insist on being obfuscated in their internet use.

Comment: Re:Not until Google+ allows pseudonyms (Score 2) 456

by Radiophobic (#36879622) Attached to: Is Twitter Rendered Obsolete By Google+?

As far as I see it, with it's requirement for real names Google has essentially taken a first real step to being evil, while Twitter on the other side seems to be a much more open platform that is used by a lot of people that don't want their real names to be known for one reason or another.

How do you come up with that conclusion? That's like a child saying their parents are evil for making them go to bed at a reasonable hour. If you look at all the other social networks, a lot of griefing and spam comes out of people using fake accounts and psuedonyms. Its not impossible to do either of those on google+, but its certainly going to make people less likely to do it. I think griefing and spam is evil. I think that google is perfectly justified to prohibit the use of pseudonyms. Especially since its still in the beta phase, and they are still trying to work with a limited user base.

Comment: Re:Obviously a respons to the Apple promotion (Score 1) 219

by Radiophobic (#36204306) Attached to: Microsoft Promo: a PC and Xbox In Every Dorm Room
I know someone who is about to buy the lowest rung macbook because they can't afford a better one so they can get the free ipod touch. I offered him my ipod touch in the meantime so he could save up some money and buy a better computer in a year. So yes, people are buying mac's (at least partially) for the ipod.

Comment: Re:your own bubble (Score 1) 408

by Radiophobic (#36162846) Attached to: The Rise of Filter Bubbles
Well, that was an unnecessary insult. It wasn't just me. Most of the people I know with similar leanings were equally shocked. I wasn't seeing any of the good things that they were doing right; they didn't talk about them, and neither did the opposition. It was kind of a ridiculous election. Very american; people spent most of the time slinging dirt at each other instead of talking about policies. I wasn't blindly accepting anyones propaganda, I looked around, and the internet didn't seem to have much positive to say about the conservative party.

Good day to avoid cops. Crawl to work.