Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: I would avoid such a website. (Score 1) 374

by REALMAN (#47695713) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Would You Pay For Websites Without Trolls?

Civility is codeword for "all who agree with me"

Any site that removes comments or participation from "trolls" would most certainly end up restricting comment from those who don't agree. Take Climate Change for example. How many news sites have stated that they won't "allow" the deniers AKA those who disagree, to post.

Comment: Your OFFICIAL global warming news! (Score 2) 552

by REALMAN (#47461905) Attached to: The Last Three Months Were the Hottest Quarter On Record

Hi there, We grant seekers AHEM uh... scientists at the Japan Meteorological Agency Thought we would help out the IPCC which has reported no significant warming in the last 17 years or so by switching to quarterly scare tactics AHEM uh... warnings. Please believe us as we only want more funding grants AHEM uh... to help you citizens.

Sincerely
The Japan Meteorological Agency
REALLY :D

Comment: Re:GLobal warming scien is simple (Score 0) 547

by REALMAN (#47307061) Attached to: NOAA: Earth Smashed A Record For Heat In May 2014, Effects To Worsen

Really? Falsifiable and tested??

Says who? You?

You never did mention that CO2 is only about 0.039% of the atmosphere and is just a TRACE gas. You forgot to mention that the IPCC has stated publicly that there has been no significant warming in over 17 years.

Never mind. The sky is still falling. Eat your bug protein and pay your carbon credits while Al Gore and those like him laugh at you in their million dollar carbon spewing mansions, eating Steak and Caviar while they drop your money into their bank accounts to pay for seaside properties they claimed would be inundated by the flooding waters due to global warming.

Stay asleep and stay stupid.

Comment: Isn't all food really "sustainable" ? (Score 1) 137

by REALMAN (#46885587) Attached to: Interview: Ask Ben Starr About the Future of Food

I keep hearing this nonsense about "sustainable" food. All of our current food is sustainable, otherwise our grocery stores would be empty.
Isn't what you really mean about "sustainable" food is that it's food for the poor people while REAL food like meats and cheeses and fresh vegetables are for the elite while we poor people should be relegated to the processed junk food and imitation soybean meats along with the GMO's?

Comment: How exactly were the people proven wrong? (Score 1) 482

by REALMAN (#46403309) Attached to: Pro-Vaccination Efforts May Be Scaring Wary Parents From Shots

According to the article, the people were given information that basically said. "You can't prove autism is from vaccinations" and the rest was scare tactics. Photos of kids suffering from the afflictions the vaccines purport to prevent.

How is this any different than the religious argument?

You can't prove God doesn't exist. This is what happens in hell.

My body belongs to me. You shouldn't worry if I don't get vaccinated if you have been vaccinated... Right? You shouldn't worry if my child hasn't been vaccinated if your child has been vaccinated... Right?

Comment: More Spin with Fakery. (Score 1) 310

by REALMAN (#44922541) Attached to: Arctic Ice Extent Tops 2012's, But Is 6th Lowest In History

"a paper published in Nature ESTIMATING Arctic ice extent for the past 1450 years shows a sharp decline in Arctic ice beginning in the mid-20th century."

Estimating translates to "using models to GUESS the arctic ice sea extent in the past AND THEN proffering that as PROOF that 2013 was the 6th lowest"

Hide the decline... Hide the decline...

Comment: This is supposed to be an example of science?? (Score 1) 251

by REALMAN (#44592763) Attached to: Why Weather Control Conspiracy Theories Are Scientifically Ludicrous

"One gallon of jet fuel weighs approximately 6.7 pounds. Take a Boeing 747-400, for example: a fully-loaded 747 flying from London to Hong Kong would require almost a full tank of gas – somewhere between 50,000 and 60,000 gallons of fuel. That’s upwards of 370,000 pounds of fuel in the tanks. Between the weight of the fuel, the passengers, the cargo, and the luggage onboard, there’s simply no room left for “chemtrail” chemicals even if they did want to spray us all with toxic gunk."

Who said chemtrails were made on London to Hongkong flights? This is your rebuttal of chemtrails??

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Comment: Punishing those who would DARE disagree (Score 0) 365

by REALMAN (#44263545) Attached to: Google Raises Campaign Funds For Climate Change Denier

"Google Raises Campaign Funds For Climate Change Denier" - ---------- as if campaign fund raising should be refused to those who don't agree with the climate change Nazi's. Let's try a new title. Google Raises Campaign Funds For Democratic Party Denier" or maybe "Google Raises Campaign Funds For Right to Abortion Denier" or even "Google Raises Campaign Funds For Gay Marriage Denier"

Comment: Wow! This guy is stupid. (Score 3, Insightful) 768

by REALMAN (#43942943) Attached to: Seeking Fifth Amendment Defenders

The fifth amendment does substantially more than protect you from having to answer "did you do it".

Scenario:

You are innocent of the crime you are accused of.

Prosecutor: Were you at the scene of the crime?
Accused: Yes.

This statement can be used against you to find you guilty.

Prosecutor: Did you have anything against the victim
Accused: Yes.

This statement can be used against you to find you guilty.

Prosecutor: Do you have a gun?
Accused: Yes.

This statement can be used against you to find you guilty.

Prosecutor: Were you having an affair with the victims wife?
Accused: Yes.

This statement can be used against you to find you guilty.

I could go on and on and on. We know from the outset of this scenario that the accused is not guilty but each and every one of his statements can be used against him in court to find him guilty despite his innocence.

This is why we have the fifth amendment.

Comment: Quick answer (Score 1) 768

by REALMAN (#43942849) Attached to: Seeking Fifth Amendment Defenders

"The first is that you can refuse to answer a point-blank question asking whether you committed a crime, even if the question elicits no other information that ought to remain private. The second is that if you refuse to answer, a court cannot even consider that as a factor in determining the likelihood of guilt."

And why do you suppose the Court can't use your refusal as evidence of guilt? Hmmmmm? That's right. The fifth amendment. Stupid.

The moon may be smaller than Earth, but it's further away.

Working...