Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Yes and no. (Score 1) 93

> "Smartphone: text message to Jane. I had a great time on our date last night. What are you doing on Saturday?"

I was shocked that my Nexus S can practically do this now. "Send text to XXXX, I'll be home around 6 p.m." It worked, mostly. The text recognition worked flawlessly, but I did have to hit the "send" button with a finger. Beats using the on-screen keyboard.

Comment: Re:College is a choice... (Score 1) 804

by PunditGuy (#34710860) Attached to: Should Colleges Ban Classroom Laptop Use?

What if somebody is a brilliant theoretician but they easily lose focus when people nearby do distracting things? Still a weak-minded, unmotivated individual?

Um, yeah. Of course, back then, a tight sweater would have been a hell of a lot more distracting than a laptop screen saver.

If you easily lose focus, that's your issue. Learn to concentrate. Banning laptops won't take care of your problem anyway. Lectures don't all take place in dark, windowless rooms -- something distracting will always happen.

Comment: Re:Partisanship (Score 1) 945

by PunditGuy (#34689202) Attached to: The Right's War On Net Neutrality
Freddie and Fannie were laggers in the subprime market. The regulation that I think you're referring to said that banks could not use different loan criteria based on where the customer lives -- so if you made the business decision to offer NINJA loans in the suburbs, you had to offer them in the inner city as well. Nobody forced any bank to issue any NINJA loan.

I'd be more likely to believe the fiction that the poor financial institutions were helpless in the face of big government if it weren't for the loan derivatives that were the real cause of the crisis. Wall Street gambled, abetted by the ratings agencies, and left taxpayers on the hook when the scheme ran out of steam.

Comment: Re:Partisanship (Score 1) 945

by PunditGuy (#34687450) Attached to: The Right's War On Net Neutrality
If you think that the lesson of the housing crash is that the government should have left private industry to its own devices, there's absolutely no hope for you whatsoever.

I still don't understand how saying "you can't discriminate" is the same as a government takeover. Under that logic, every damn lunch counter in the southern U.S. must be the property of the feds.

Comment: Re:Look (Score 1) 339

by PunditGuy (#33667108) Attached to: Supreme Court May Tune In To Music Download Case
These are damages that are available to the plaintiff according to the statute. They are statutory damages. They're available because the alternative is to make the plaintiff go through the time and expense of figuring out what the "real" damages were, when they were the wronged party in the first place. Think about a guy in a van selling fake Disney t-shirts. In order to figure out the real damages, Disney needs to know how many shirts the guy sold. They could do so by relying on the guy's immaculate double-entry bookkeeping, I suppose. Luckily, under U.S. copyright law, they don't have to.

That scenario is probably closer to what the framers had in mind, since digital file sharing wasn't a concern back then. The law needs to be updated to address non-commercial digital infringements. But statutory damages aren't the problem here, and have their place.
Image

3 Drinks a Day Keeps the Doctor Away 470 Screenshot-sm

Posted by samzenpus
from the drink-em-if-you-got-em dept.
Nzimmer911 writes "Heavy drinkers outlive non-drinkers according to a 20 years study following 1,824 people. From the article: 'But a new paper in the journal Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research suggests that - for reasons that aren't entirely clear - abstaining from alcohol does actually tend to increase one's risk of dying even when you exclude former drinkers. The most shocking part? Abstainers' mortality rates are higher than those of heavy drinkers.'"

We will have solar energy as soon as the utility companies solve one technical problem -- how to run a sunbeam through a meter.

Working...