We don't need government help to prosper.
Said the guy, on the internet.
We don't need government help to prosper.
Said the guy, on the internet.
The public is moving inexorably toward acceptance of gay marriage.
Check the historical data:
I don't honestly see Jeb as having that much a chance, at least not if it were done today.
He's winning the money primary, which is the only one that really matters.
I also think there are a lot of folks in the US that just do not want another dynasty name in there, no more Clintons or Bushes.
Well, there's the problem, isn't it? It just doesn't matter that folks in the US think when it comes to US elections. The decisions are always made for us long before election day.
Considering the Democrats who controlled both parties failed to do anything but renew it, the Republicans may be our best shot - particularly while they don't control the executive branch.
With Jeb Bush about to become the nominated leader of the party? Good luck with that.
When it comes to stuff like homeland security and defense appropriations, the parties don't matter. It's neo-cons all the way down.
Did you know that Jeb Bush has asked Howard Baker to become his senior advisor?
It's gonna take a much bigger shift in government than just a one party or the other taking over to get rid of the Patriot Act.
I just got my hands on a 6 string after too long without and was toying with 'ubuntu offerings this weekend.
You can use MuseScore to convert sheet music or midi files into guitar tab, if you're interested. You have to use plugins which are readily available from the MuseScore community.
MuseScore is one of the most important open source applications installed on my computer. I have nothing but respect for the people who've developed it. They were also the people behind the phenomenal Wikifonia website, which aggregated crowd-sourced musical scores, and single-handedly kept the Great American Songbook vital and allowed thousands of young jazz musicians to access online, transposable scores of hundreds of jazz standards until it was forced off the air by music publishers and Hal Leonard. Luckily, some kind soul in Belgium rar'd the entire archive of Wikifonia and smuggled it out to a guy I know via Mega and that great resource for musicians still exists (and can be found at the Wikifonia fan page at Facebook, but you'll have to dig a bit). Until Wikifonia, musicians had to tote around poorly-transcribed sheets or Real Books with ugly calligraphy.
I use MuseScore every single day and it's every bit the equal of any of the expensive music score programs like Sibelius or Finale. If you are a musician or composer or use musical manuscripts, I highly recommend MuseScore. There are plugins that will do everything from providing tools to people who score films like me or just someone who wants to covert sheet music into harmonica, guitar or uke tabs. Laying out everything from a simple lead sheet to an orchestral score is a pure joy using MuseScore, and if you know a little bit about how musical manuscripts work, the learning curve is not bad at all.
I don't know any of these people personally, but if any of the MuseScore team see this, I want to thank you for your work. I've contributed what money I can to the project, but I want you to know how much your work has enriched my life.
And I can't come up with a economically defensible reason to go back,
You understand that the only option in 1968 for finding out whether or not there is a good reason to explore the moon is actually going to the moon, right? And despite your objectivist baloney, human beings do things without a profit motive. Sometimes, great things. How much did Isaac Newton profit when he was working out optics? You think Galileo or Copernicus were doing their rather unpopular work for the sweet sweet coin?
What is money except a measure of economic value? What is capital except a measure of society's perceived value in making a task possible?
Late stage capital is a complete refutation of this purely materialistic vision.
If you have to force people to do something via the application of the government's power of life and death, it probably isn't worth doing.
Wait, you think the guys that went to the moon or the guys that built the Apollo rockets or the people who paid a minuscule share of their tax money to pay for the space program were only doing it because of the "government's power of life and death"?
Maybe you're too young to remember this: https://youtu.be/g25G1M4EXrQ
I was too young to remember it, though I was alive at the time. What I do remember is that the space program inspired generations and it cost less than Americans were spending on cigarettes and cigars every year. We're talking about a people that were only 16 years from having saved their bacon grease and string to be able to help the war effort. We're talking about a generation of people who had come out of a very dark chapter in human history, having sacrificed universally for something they believed in. They didn't scrimp for war bonds and enlist in the military because they thought, "what profit is there in this?" but because they were inspired to do so by larger events. And the larger events of the US space program similarly inspired generations of young people to set their sights beyond just going to work selling insurance or vacuum cleaners door-to-door. During the space program, interest in the sciences - all of the sciences - exploded, and set the route that led to almost all of the technological innovation that followed in the decades hence.
I'm not sure what happened to you. When did you lose your ability to be inspired by something besides selfish financial gain? Though you demonstrate the symptoms of someone who fell in love with the pseudo-intellectual pursuit known as "objectivism", most likely as an undergrad, clearly something else went wrong as well.
[in case anyone is interested, here is the entirety of the JFK speech excerpted above:
Sure, it would have happened later, but at least we'd get some kind of direct benefit from it, instead of a bunch of museum pieces that no one remembers how to reconstruct, and Tang.
You think Tang was the only benefit of the US space program?
If there hadn't been a space program, Richard Branson would still be selling vinyl records and Elon Musk would be a mediocre video game developer.
How stupid people are to think that business profits are the only way to measure benefit to society. How small-minded and provincial. And all because of reading Ayn Rand's poorly-written fantasy novels when they're freshmen.
Giving the government credit for creating the current internet is like giving Abner Doubleday credit for Henry Aaron's home runs.
Now I'm confused. If baseball hadn't been invented, how would Hank Aaron have hit home runs again?
Maybe we need to work on your similes.
Government will fuck this up - it always does.
Right. If private enterprise had been in charge of the space program, we might have sent a man to the moon by now.
I'm not complaining.
That's exactly what you're doing.
So any male that cracks a dick joke subconsciously wants to suck cocks all day and either can't or won't admit it to himself
That's good stuff. I'm glad I asked and I'm glad you shared those links.
Oh, I get that. But don't you think it's a little bit insulting that the only way they could make it interesting to Slashdot readers is to make references to bad 1970s sci-fi?
My problem is not with the new technology. My problem is that someone thinks we can only be interested via dumb fictional references.
Of course it was. The entire comment was a way to get that joke in. I've been saving it for just such an occasion.
"Be *excellent* to each other." -- Bill, or Ted, in Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure