Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:yes it does (Score 1) 463

by Pojut (#35002058) Attached to: Obama Nominates RIAA Lawyer For Solicitor General

I voted for Obama because he was -quite sadly- the lesser "evil" of everyone running. Yes, third parties included. Once they reach the national stage of a presidential election, anyone still around is going to be a "bad" choice by virtue of what's required to get that far. With that in mind, Obama seemed to, at the very least, have the best intentions, if not necessarily the best plan. He also seemed the most likely to move towards the center, should the balance of power ever split (as it did with the mid-terms...and, as evidenced by the number of Democrats pissed off with him since the mid-terms, he is doing just that.) All that being said, had I been the same person in 2008 that I am today, I likely would have just stayed home.

That's not a troll, nor is it hair splitting: that's plain honesty.

Comment: Re:yes it does (Score 1) 463

by Pojut (#34999980) Attached to: Obama Nominates RIAA Lawyer For Solicitor General

Pojut,
Your problem--that you don't understand--is that you are gullible

AVT,

Your problem--that you don't understand--is that you must have missed the multiple times I explicitly said I didn't personally believe him. Like this time:

I said I thought he was genuine...as in, I believed that HE believed himself. That's not the same thing as saying that I thought he would actually accomplished(sic) everything he claimed he would.

And this time:

I'm telling you that I was aware that HE thought he could do all those things...that's very different than BELIEVING he could.

My opinion of how someone thinks of themselves and my personal opinion of that person can be entirely different...and, in this case, they were/are. If you consider that splitting hairs, I don't know what to tell you.

Comment: Re:yes it does (Score 1) 463

by Pojut (#34998442) Attached to: Obama Nominates RIAA Lawyer For Solicitor General

Well. They do. All of them. They tell whatever lie they think they need to tell at the time to get elected. There is no fallout from it. If it starts to become an issue they either get the press on their side to ignore it or if the press is not on their side then they manufacture something to get the heat off.

Not to the point of saying they are going to COMPLETELY overhaul the healthcare system, or close a prison that houses hundreds of terrorists/war criminals. Those aren't the kinds of things they make "promises" about. They may say they will lower taxes, or enact some piece of legislation, but they don't express intentions of modifying whole chunks of the way our society or government functions.

"I did not say he would not lie. I just said he wouldn't lie that big." Come on. That is crap. There is no lie they will not tell to get elected. Once in power they will do what they need to to try and stay in power.

Which is EXACTLY my point. Someone wouldn't consciously and purposely lie about radically changing our way of life BEFORE they get elected, and then, by choice, NOT do so once they ARE elected.

That's the exact opposite of trying to stay in power.

Comment: Re:yes it does (Score 2) 463

by Pojut (#34998098) Attached to: Obama Nominates RIAA Lawyer For Solicitor General

Oh. Nevermind. You are right. Politicians do not make promises that they do not at the time intend to keep.

Do you have some kind of comprehension problem, or are you purposely being an ass? I didn't say politicians don't make promises they don't intend to keep, and I didn't say they don't lie. I said he wouldn't make that many promises, nor promises of that magnitude, if he was being purposely deceiteful.

Seriously, Dish. You need to stop responding to what you want to read, and start responding to what you actually read.

Comment: Re:yes it does (Score 1) 463

by Pojut (#34996618) Attached to: Obama Nominates RIAA Lawyer For Solicitor General

No professional politician believes the things he says to get elected.

I find it funny you would say that, given this post. That being said, "not believing" and "not going to follow through with" are two very different things.

How it is that you can watch an interview with him and suddenly believe that he is being honest about what he believes is beyond me.

It wasn't sudden, I meant time collectively spent. Also, as I said above, being honest about intentions and actually following through with those intentions are two very different things.

Work expands to fill the time available. -- Cyril Northcote Parkinson, "The Economist", 1955

Working...