It means that a murderer, after "changing his mind", is no longer the same person.

• 1. Commit murder
• 2. Change your mind
• 3. No longer guilty

I always wondered. What if the targets are covered with a high quality reflective mirror surface?

...to realize the obvious

Yep, I had that wtf moment after I clicked the submit button.

Without reading the whole article. I believe that with all the muscle that Google (Motorola) could put behind this claim, the case has more to do with strategy. It's a case to better loose and then later refer to. As the first poster said, -"Tech can be obvious but round corners can't?"

please mode parent up

yep, they know how to teach nature a lesson

it has all you'll need, and can easily provide an API service with little extra work,

Whatever it is, God put it there to test your faith

Mode parent up. Same 43 here. We know what's crap and what's not. I actually cut the corp cord long ago and do a good deal with my own products.

43 here, and more relevant than ever before.

SCO didn't have any evidence against IBM, yet IBM had to produce all sources and their mother, Any well written conjecture would suffice,

Apple now has to comply with all IP notices as they are the champions of the game. Soon they will discover that is not possible.

and make sure that the next one is a good one

Sometimes when I go to long thinking on a problem, I stop and have a beer or a glass of wine, a bit after that, the brains changes the way it thinks about the problem. Often times this brings a better/faster abstract solution and worst/buggier code.