Comment: Re:And of course Apple has to have their version (Score 1) 149
iLand
As head patent attorney for Apple Inc. I must tell you that you will have to take down that post or face prosecution for monetary compensation.
|
|
iLand
As head patent attorney for Apple Inc. I must tell you that you will have to take down that post or face prosecution for monetary compensation.
NRA is a marketing arm of gun manufacturers.
Except for the fact that the NRA gets very little money from gun manufacturers. Where they get their money from is millions of Americans writing checks so that the NRA will represent them in Washington.
More facts, less emotion.
Okay, here are FACTS . If you think that all their money comes from their members, you sir are more than just a bit delusional. ( BTW, I was a life member, before the NRA became the mouthpiece of the gun manufacturers )
No, actually, they don't give a shit. I could make myself a firearm, RIGHT NOW, and they're OK with that (so long as it doesn't infringe on certain things, like bore diameter, barrel length if it's a shotgun or pistol.. stuff you can own, but need some licenses (tax stamps) from the ATF to own).
For the price of a single 3D printer you could slam out dozens of zip guns. Don't even need any serious machining tools for that.
The whole 3D printed gun scare is just that. A scare. It's headlines. That is all.
Kid, I was "slamming out dozens of zip guns" before you, OR 3D printers were a glimmer in somebody's eye, now get the hell off my lawn
I doubt they have the storage capacity.
you're kidding, right ?
"The app chirps at you when it notices rough braking, aggressive acceleration, or speeding over 70 mph."
I do that all the time. I like to do that. That's why I bought a sports car. Why would I want an app to chirp at me when I do that?
Hack the module to go "way to go !" instead of chirping
a militia armed with three-shot rifles which might explode at any moment wouldn't get very far.
A militia armed with AR 16s and AK 47s with 50 round drums wouldn't get very far against a government equipped with stealth bombers, UAV drones, tanks, etc.
Precisely. If there is any chance at all that my gun will simply refuse to fire when I pull the trigger, I don't want anything to do with it.
Then I would guess you've never fired any kind of semi-auto gun because they're so totally reliable
The engines used for the Antares are refurbished Russian NK-33's, originally built for use on the N-1 booster. These engines are pretty much 40+ years old.
So is the engine on my Hemi Road Runner. Want to run for pinks? There's this thing called "maintenance" and another called "improvement" that all the cool guys do. Oh yeah, get off my lawn.
So really, the conservatives are doing us a favor. Once the planet is unlivable, we'll have to leave. So doing your best to destroy the environment is actually progressive.
Yes. Ironic isn't it?
Congrats for Antares.
Yes, sending a rocket into orbit is a major breakthrough, just like it was half a century ago.
I know it thrills the hearts of the Galtians among us that some billionaires have finally succeeded in solving a puzzle that the rest of us solved collectively in the early 1960s, so I'm going to refrain from saying "big whoop".
Space will not be truly conquered until private enterprise makes it profitable to do so. So yes, it is a "big whoop" as you so eloquently put it.
Especially since I predict the greatest impact of North Korea's nuclear program is if they manage to time their detonation to be in LEO above Nebraska, taking out the maximum number of LEO satellites and spraying debris through orbit, possibly causing the Kessler effect. And that being in addition to an EMP causing massive disruption over the US. We are at the point where a single nuke can cause trillions of dollars of damage. Just getting it there is the problem. No more space program, public or private, until it's cleaned up, if we are to the point where a nuke in LEO can seed the cloud.
You need to get out more
You make the assumption that a long list of authors indicates a truly collaborative research effort. In practice, this is very rarely the case. From my experience, nine times out of ten the work is done completely by the primary author or the first two authors. The rest of the authors are supervisors, technical managers, those who secured the funding, possibly a technician who assisted with the experiments, etc., who never even lay eyes on the paper until it's basically finished.
You make the assumption that the work is done by the primary author or the first two authors. It has been MY experience that the work is often done by the rest of the authors and the the primary or first two just take the credit. My $0.02
Perhaps you feel you are being treated unfairly. It would be unfortunate if I had to leave a garrison of Mouseketeers here.
And Funicello died from the shock
Since we're all here, we must not be all there. -- Bob "Mountain" Beck