Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

Comment It's been available for a while (Score 3, Informative) 94

It's nice they've got an official box and all, but the service to send disks to Amazon has been there for a while (as a beta program).

Here is a blog post from 2009 explaining the service.

Of course, a nice official controlled and encrytped box is a far tidier way of doing things!

-- Pete.

Comment Re:"... only if we're married or similarly situate (Score 1) 258

Frankly, don't see the point of having separate bank accounts, it is both your money, but if it makes your life easier, go ahead. :)

We actually have a bunch of accounts, each serving different purposes. It helps for budgeting when you know that the X amount in your personal account is available for whatever personal expenditure, the Y amount in your general account is for bills, rent, etc, and the Z in the savings account is there for other purposes. As I am a freelance contractor, I also have a business account, and I need to be able to explain each transaction there for taxes etc.

-- Pete.

Comment Re:"... only if we're married or similarly situate (Score 1) 258

You let your wife have the money, but not the passwords?

Seriously, if you don't trust her with everything, why the hell are you married to her?

She has about the same access to the money as she does to the passwords actually...they're both in a vault (aka "bank") that she has access to if she absolutely needs it. Day to day access she has her own money and computer accounts that she can use, and she doesn't use the same ones that I do. Just because I'm the one who usually accesses the "main" bank account and my passwords, that doesn't mean she's not trusted to do it, and she's certainly not blocked in any way from either.

I see this as different from "sharing" passwords, she doesn't know my passwords because she doesn't need to look (need is different from capability here). She trusts me to have my own accounts, and I trust her to have hers.

-- Pete.

Comment "... only if we're married or similarly situated" (Score 4, Interesting) 258

I answered, "... only if we're married or similarly situated", but even then it's not so cut and dried. I generally don't even let my wife have my passwords, but there is a paper note with the master password to my password vault that she can access if there's a dire need.

It doesn't help that whatever I do (including setting up her own password vaults), she keeps terrible passwords for herself, and forgets them on a regular basis. Whenever she needs to access files on the NAS even with her own ID, I need to reset her password etc. This is frustrating to say the least.

-- Pete.

Comment Not the only factor? (Score 5, Interesting) 324

Actually I see another reason to keep the base model at 16Gb. App development is crucial to the iPhone (and any other smartphone out there), and many developers don't like to do the extra work to keep their application sizes sane. However, as long as the base model is 16Gb, app developers need to keep this in mind when developing their apps.

If this encourages even only some developers to keep their applications down to a sensible size (knowing that anyone with a 16Gb device will either avoid their application, or delete it as soon as they run low on space) then I guess it's worth it.

I'm not saying the extra money in Apple's pocket isn't a factor, but I'm sure there are other factors at play here, this theory being just one of them.

-- Pete.

Comment Already done... (Score 4, Informative) 80

I was a backer of this project that was pretty much the same:
Packed Pixels

Nice screen at 2048 x 1536, but not yet delivered. They just about hit their funding goal of £60,000 on 29th November 2014, and they're now taking pre-orders. It would probably be better to just pre-order one of these than back a whole new Kickstarter - at least these are close to production.

-- Pete.

Comment Re:Since when? (Score 1) 83

As long as people like you exist, and they always will, it goes to show why we should never trust the government to have these sorts of capabilities.

Snoop on property within the UK .. fucks sakes, you realize we're talking about people here right. Nah, best to call it property and further distance yourself from what this really means.

Shame on you.

You appear to be mistaking someone who is stating the facts of the situation for someone who agrees with the situation.

Laws should be written simly, cleanly, and transparently, and the security forces of a nation should be working for the greater good of the nation rather than against the native citizens of that nation.

As an aside, I have spent most of my working life working (both as an employee, and as a contractor) with a company that is alleged to have been a direct target of GCHQ.

-- Pete.

Comment Re:Since when? (Score 0) 83

No. CSE, NSA, GCHQ, NZ/AUS's agencies, all of 'em have explicit laws preventing them from operating internally.

From the Intelligence Services Act 1994 you will see that GCHQ's powers are quite well defined.

This involves giving advice and assistance "to any other organisation which is determined for the purposes of this section" - which includes MI5 (Security Service) as they are a member of the Intelligence and Security Committee. And the constraints are:

The functions referred to in subsection (1)(a) above shall be exercisable only—

(a)in the interests of national security, with particular reference to the defence and foreign policies of Her Majesty’s Government in the United Kingdom; or

(b)in the interests of the economic well-being of the United Kingdom in relation to the actions or intentions of persons outside the British Islands; or

(c)in support of the prevention or detection of serious crime.

Although their powers to activate a warrant under section 3(2)(c) may not relate to property in the British Islands, that doesn't mean that they cannot work with, and provide assitance to the Security Service (MI5) under section 3(2)(a). Do note that only 3(2)(c) [and 1(2)(c), which is identical except in reference to SIS instead of GCHQ] is excluded for GCHQ to use as justification for a warrant to snoop on property within the UK.

Just because people don't like the idea or that they find it unpalatable, that doesn't make it less true.

-- Pete.

Comment Since when? (Score 2) 83

The OP states that GCHQ is, "purported by officials to be focused on foreign intelligence and counterterrorism". Since when?

My understanding has always been that there are 3 main "legs" to British Intelligence:

  • MI5 for internal security within the country
  • SIS (aka MI6) for international security outside the country
  • GCHQ for providing communication intelligence and security towards both of the above, and for advice on protecting key national infrastructure (via CESG)

In this context, GCHQ should have always been providing internal communications intelligence for MI5, I'm not sure why this should be news to anyone?

-- Pete.

Comment Damn, I trusted them (Score 5, Insightful) 145

Sourceforge was always my go-to place for trusted original non-screwed files, and now I check the list of projects owned by sf-editor1, 2, and 3 and I see a lot of projects that I have used in the past.

Sometimes (particularly for older projects) it is very difficult to find a home-page or source that I can trust...and now it just became a lot harder.

-- Pete.

Comment Re:Negotiating when desperate (Score 1) 583

Some years ago when I was between contracts as a freelance contractor, I had an agent call me about a job that sounded interesting in a location that was a little more than inconvenient. He offered me a position dead on my field of excellence, and piqued my interest...until the rate came in. He was offering between 1/3 and 1/2 of my typical daily rate, I think I practically laughed in his face. From there he resorted to pleading that I accept something close to the rate, and that I'd "be doing them a huge favour" if I could work at that rate. I think maybe he misunderstood why I work, and how "doing people a favour" who I have never met, is not exactly high on my list of motivations.

I think he also tried the, "but this is better than you receive with no contract at all" line...that went down just as badly for him.

Some people will do anything just to try and find expertise on the cheap, and if you have the skills, it is your imperitive to know what those skills are worth.

-- Pete.

Comment Re:Simple (Score 4, Interesting) 610

All those fucking cards and coupons in my inventory and no option to just delete them

Sell the cards (they'll typically only get you a few cents, but it adds up and it gets them out of your account), trade the coupons with your friends for coupons that actually interest you (a friend had a 90% off coupon for a game this weekend that semi-interested me). The coupon gave me a game for 70 cents, and my card sales paid for that.

-- Pete.

Comment Re:As a Change Manager... (Score 1) 294

What matters? The data.

Sure - and we take our data very seriously - really, I doubt we'd last long as a telco if we didn't. But the underlying fact is that the data needs systems, your data sits in databases, that in turn reside on servers - hopefully virtual servers that can be moved around to minimise downtime and impact, but still systems at the end of the day.

The new way of thinking is certainly going to be more data orientated in the future, and for sure, there are still a lot of improvements to be done, but there is certainly no lack of focus in that area of the business already - in fact any company that has a data warehousing team to take care of the long term broad reporting needs of the business is already well aware of the importance of data.

In the future there'll be more focus on data (security) protection in the world of IT - we're already mostly past the days where people are only just starting to think about the implications of data loss and data mining for information though. There is a lot of work that can be done in controlling data access, and ensuring that all data has the appropriate levels of protection, and that it is managed in the correct way, I agree with you 100% there.

-- Pete.

Slashdot Top Deals

10.0 times 0.1 is hardly ever 1.0.