It's really directed at whoever created the template (wix.com, apparently). Nothing wrong with using a template, but when your fancy effects get in the way of viewing information about your products, I'd really consider looking elsewhere.
Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!
We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).
What an annoying site. Here I was hoping the bar would be raised with flash on the way out, but it looks like people can just recreate garbage flash sites with equally-bad HTML5 sites.
The one upside is it's slightly usable on mobile, even if it still looks awful.
The title on your original link does say MTK6572, and from the pastebin linked elsewhere it seems the RPi2 is also a Cortex-A7. I agree it's still a pretty old architecture though.
Dual core A9? You sure about that?
Nvidia used to make integrated chipsets for Intel and AMD, what changed is Intel no longer licenses the chipsets for the i7+ and AMD is now a direct competitor with their purchase of ATI.
Decrypting the contents may not be necessary for nefarious uses
A more reasonable issue may be people targeting US passports for thefts.
I've got about 1100 albums in a library of over 300GB (90% lossless), even running with the actual tracks on my NAS over WiFi to my MBP, it's very fast.
I don't understand the people who say it's slow, maybe it's slow under WinXP on qemu on a raspberry pi?
126.96.36.199 = is not a valid DNS server, likely they meant 188.8.131.52 which is the secondary Google Public DNS address.
It's also possible they meant 4.2.2.[1-6] (of which 184.108.40.206 may be the most popular), which isn't really a public DNS server either, but may be close enough to count as a backup for Google.
In each case that generateSeed() is called, it's also combined with some data from
Framerate performance is... meh. For the hardware I'm running on (eVGA GTX 670FTW, Intel 2600k), I'd expect nothing less than a rock solid 60fps with the graphics on mid-to-high settings. Most of the time there isn't anything graphically intensive going on, but my framerate often dipped into the low 20s anyways.
I'm running everything maxed on a 560Ti / 3930k. Everything seems smooth although I'm not watching the FPS. Maybe it's more CPU dependent?
Yeah, it's not like they sell a similar adapter for $9