Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Donations never replace real funding. (Score 1) 159

by Ouilsen (#42735919) Attached to: Google Gives 15,000 Raspberry Pis To UK Schools

Great. 500000$ are maybe 20 teachers (without infrastructure) for 1 year. It is indeed great that Google donates money to schools and I do not want to belittle that fact. However phrases like these leave me baffled:

  Google aren't prepared to wait for government or someone else to fix the problems...

Not Google, nor any other private company or entity is going to fix the education system. That is the whole point of having public schools. Without the state committing to education you are screwed. There is not a single example in history where a private education system succeeded in the long run.

The Internet

+ - the piratebay launches free vpn

Submitted by bs0d3
bs0d3 (2439278) writes "The Piratebay team is going to be making the RIAA angry, with the launch of a new ad supported VPN service. PrivitizeVPN is available for free from thepiratebay. Instead of earning revenue through subscription as ipredator does, PrivitizeVPN comes packaged to install babylon search bar (adware). PrivitizeVPN appears to be available for windows users only at the moment. The Piratebay staff has a long history of promoting services that have no logs; e.g. , you can't get in trouble if your anonymized ip is subpoenaed by government officials. Although PrivitizeVPN is being released silently, with no press coverage, no official statement, and no comments from The Piratebay of any kind, people are assuming that PrivitizeVPN will have the same familiar data protection policies. A backup download location has been setup here for people who have limited access to thepiratebay domain."
Science

+ - The Sweet Mystery of Science

Submitted by
Hugh Pickens writes
Hugh Pickens writes writes "Biologist David P. Barash writes in the LA Times that as a scientist he has been participating in a deception for more than four decades — a benevolent and well intentioned deception — but a deception nonetheless. "When scientists speak to the public or to students, we talk about what we know, what science has discovered," writes Barash. "After all, we work hard deciphering nature's secrets and we're proud whenever we succeed. But it gives the false impression that we know pretty much everything, whereas the reality is that there's a whole lot more that we don't know." Teaching and writing only about what is known risks turning science into a mere catalog of established facts, suggesting that "knowing" science is a matter of memorizing says Barash. "It is time, therefore, to start teaching courses, giving lectures and writing books about what we don't know about biology, chemistry, geology, physics, mathematics." Barash isn't talking about the obvious unknowns, such as "Is there life on other planets?" Looking just at his field, evolutionary biology, the unknowns are immense: How widespread are nonadaptive traits? To what extent does evolution proceed by very small, gradual steps versus larger, quantum jumps? What is the purpose of all that "junk DNA"? Did human beings evolve from a single lineage, or many times, independently? Why does homosexuality persist? According to Barash scientists need to keep celebrating and transmitting what they know but also need to keep their eyes on what science doesn't know if the scientific enterprise is to continue attracting new adherents who will keep pushing the envelope of our knowledge rather than resting satisfied within its cozy boundaries. As Richard Dawkins writes: "Mystics exult in mystery and want it to stay mysterious. Scientists exult in mystery for a different reason: It gives them something to do.""

Comment: Re:Nonlinear least squares for dummies? (Score 3, Informative) 44

by Ouilsen (#39867349) Attached to: Google Releases Key Part of Street View Pipeline

Least squares is also often used in parameter fitting. Suppose you have a simulation with an somehow unknown parameter p. First you use a first guess as a value of p. That you run your simulation and get observed values y_obs.

Now you compare the computed values y_obs with the measured values y_mes using squares: cost = (y_obs - y_mes)^2.

By computing d p / d cost you may adapt p and redo the above steps till the squares are minimized... thus a least squares problem.

Comment: Re:New economy - post industrial age (Score 1) 373

by Ouilsen (#38614802) Attached to: US Report Sees Perils To America's Tech Future
This is too simple as an explanation for me. People as those on the streets during the London riots are the espected long-term effect of 30 years of Thatcherism. They are not "well-fed" in terms of dignity and education. To just name a few lacking key features of a sane human being. Of course they can shovel in burgers and PS3 games all day long.

Comment: Re:thanks for whoring quants (Score 1) 339

by Ouilsen (#37104570) Attached to: How Linux Mastered Wall Street
This sounds rather narrow minded to me. We just live in a society of human beings. That's the way it is. You benefit from a lot of achievements done by other people. In fact I assume that most of us profit more from the achievements of other people than the other way around. At least this holds true for myself.

Comment: Re:One word - ads (Score 1) 576

by Ouilsen (#27109197) Attached to: Why TV Lost
Well let's hope the ads decide that your show doesn't get cancelled. Sooner or later those shows will stay, which attract people relevant for the advertisment industry and influenced by ads. Which unfortunaltely I am not. So I better keep paying. Which I can.

No problem is so formidable that you can't just walk away from it. -- C. Schulz

Working...