Because someone is claiming that basic "human rights" are being violated and the kid is being oppressed. I want to know what "human right" we're talking about. Can you tell me? Is there a basic "human right" to send pictures of your willy to any girl you know? What has the world come to when we make such nonsense a "human right"?
I won't be scarred for life and neither will this girl.
You don't know this, and it isn't your place to judge on her behalf. Nobody was thrown into a gulag over this.
You may personally not mind if someone breaks into your house and takes your television. You think you watch too much TV anyway, and that person obviously needs the money or TV more than you do. But that's not a valid argument for saying that burglary isn't wrong, just as you not minding if people send you naked pictures of themselves is an argument against it being wrong when others are the recipients.
Now, if the kid didn't want the picture distributed by her, he should've known better.
Wait a minute. He can't be expected to "know better" when it comes to whether it is appropriate to send the picture in the first place, but he is supposed to "know better" that the girl would know how to bypass the "delete automatically" feature of snapchat? "Should have known better" is a two-edged sword here.
You have a brain, use it. Justify why you think such a lasting mark like a predator list is warranted
It wasn't a lasting mark on a predator list.
for 'a' picture sent probably to a crush.
I have a "crush" on your teenage daughter. You won't mind if I send her naked pictures of myself, then? She can just delete them if she doesn't want to see them, and it won't cause her any harm, right? It's harmless fun.
This seems like a case of 'stupid kid' not a case of a hardened pervert, and should be treated as such.
That's why he got such a light slap on the wrist and isn't standing in a dock facing a judge. And nobody is saying he should be.