Comment: Shut up (Score -1, Troll) 326
Shut up you tool.
Comment: Re:What? (Score 1) 355
Did you miss the part of the title that said "ultra-dense"? As in they packed more atoms of it into the cubic centimeter than you would see in a normal amount of it.
Comment: Re:Yahoo (Score 3, Informative) 437
That would have to be one hell of a stock swap since IBM's current market cap is $137 billion.
Comment: Re:Did he still steal stuff? (Score 1) 414
If the latter case, then Due Process (of the "substantive" as opposed to the "procedural" variety) would be involved, because that's the basis of the Incorporation Doctrine.
And that is the basis of their decision which is why I said what I did because I had actually read the ruling and not just the summary.
Comment: Re:Should be a followup, actually (Score 1) 230
See this post.
Comment: Re:Legal Basis? (Score 2, Informative) 414
They are to rule based on law established by the Legislature and approved by the Executive.
They did. It's this new thing called "The US Constitution".
Comment: Re:Should be a followup, actually (Score 1) 230
No it was just a poorly worded version of saying that Qt uses the native graphics API to render it's widgets so it matches the look-and-feel of the platform.
Comment: Re:Did he still steal stuff? (Score 1) 414
However, I still think that someone should not be able to get away with a crime on a technicality.
Good for you. Some of us actual value due process and police following legal procedures.
Comment: Re:Did he still steal stuff? (Score 2, Insightful) 414
You're joking right? Please tell me you are joking. Do you even know what due process means?
Due process is the principle that the government must respect all of the legal rights that are owed to a person according to the law of the land.
This case was about the police not respecting the legal rights of the accused person hence by it's very definition it is a violation of due process.
Comment: Re:That is a 1960's liberal mistake. (Score 1) 414
The way to deal with police mistakes is with sanctions and fines. This is the way it was before the 1960s.
And it was completely ineffective. Sorry, but I'd prefer not to go back to a time where due process and warrants were afterthoughts.
Comment: Re:Did he still steal stuff? (Score 1) 414
Yeah, who needs stupid things like due process. It's not like it's a constitutionally guaranteed right or anything.
Comment: Re:track my cock (Score 3, Funny) 414
And it ruins the surprise!
Comment: Re:Brutal (Score 2, Funny) 167
I agree. Rather than just this being isolated breaches of information it's much better that when attacked they have access to everyone's info! Brilliant!
Comment: Re:And... (Score 1) 167
But that's my point, why were they linked?
Laziness and convenience, probably.
Comment: Re:And... (Score 2, Informative) 167
The information wasn't accessible through the public site. The problem was that the server compromised through the public website also contained the private databases.