I've read the linked news. The 8000 convenience stores is a fake number. They say that somebody intended to partner with an existing paying network (for paying cell phone prepaid schemes). I assure you there are no 8000 stores here selling bitcoin. I bet there aren't 8000 people here knowing about bitcoin either. =)
I live in Argentina and I haven't heard of any of this. Neiher BitPagos, nor any of the other things mentioned above. Here in Argentina bitcoins are, like most enywhere else, a marginal things only some nerds know.
I know you are joking. But the real problem is that you would probably kill other kids as well, not just your own.
No. OpenStreetMap is more a data backend and its website is more oriented toward mappers than to regular users (although that is slowly changing). Routing services using OSM have been available for quite some time. OpenStreetMap is already ahead Google in many places where Google has broken and partial information.
I'm form Argentina and it saddens me that this post comments will fall among these categories:
- Peple saying "don't cry for me XXX".
- Argentines explaining that Argentina is the worst country, worse than the worst.
- Uninformed right-wing people talking about Cuba, communism.
Even the summary is wrong! That 35% is not a tax, just a pre-payment of the income tax that you can recover.
All hope is lost.
Yes, Cuba has a high value of that... It's off topic.. Take whatever index you want. The parent post is still BS.
I'm from Argentina and... Oh, god, please someone mod this BS message down!
Argentina has one of the highest Human Development Index values: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
It helped divert attention to privacy issues to a dead end for 5 years!
Just for reading the summary I can say this looks fishy. The latest Anroid release 4.4 was mainly dedicated to make Android run on smaller devices, adding tools to debug memory footprint, adding compresion of pages, sharing of things, etc. Google claims that now Android can run on a 512 MB device (which is fairly low end right now). And with ever decreasing memory prices is hard to imagine there's a place for a "lower than lower end" OS.
The "being open" reason is also not good enough. As a technology (i.e. removing Google services) Android is 100% free software. And the reason some telcos might want Firefox OS is to have a more closed environment which they can control.
Maybe Firefox could have been working to create its own Android fork, replacing Google service with Firefox services. That would be, IMO, much cooler.
My hobby is to read the conservative/libertatian viewpoints on issues like this one with a Homer-US-stereotypical voice.
Drones, Badley Manning, Assange, Gitmo.... The US is a selective dictatorship.
Don't lie, please. It gets tired.
You had said "shady law", now you talk about its merits. Now you recognize an "irregular adoption", but you had previously said "no evidence"... Let's stop this conversation... It's useless... ok? =/
The only reason you got modded up it's because you sounded interesting. Don't take advantage of people now knowing about Argentina to get karma.. =)
Just writing to point out the parent comment has loads of false information.
The new media law (which he chooses to describe as "shady") only puts anti-trust measures we didn't have here in Argentina. It has been praised by UN free speech "UN Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression" Frank La Rue and by the NGO "Reporters Without Borders".
The bit about Ernestina Herrera's sons are also false. That's an old issue form before the government, and it has already been proved that the adoption was irregular. The media conglomerate owned by her has been blocking and stopping justics for more than 10 years. What the parent comment refers to is that the real parents have not been found yet (the "desaparecidos" (missing) bank is very incomplete, this is an ingoing thing). In any case, this is handled by courts, not by the government,
It's not honest to start a comment pretending to be "over the dispute", and then dump such biased bits of information...
The TOS "advertising providers" have to comply with are very very strict. I doubt Google will agree to things like these:
[...] upon request, the Advertising Provider agrees to provide Facebook the names of and contact information for any employees and/or contractors and to specify those employees and/or contractors involved in designing, targeting, serving advertising related products/services, or otherwise providing any services covered by this Agreement.
And Facebook would be able to "audit" Google for anything covered in the agreement:
Facebook reserves the right to audit the Advertising Provider for compliance with these terms.
And if anything goes wrong, Facebook already had decided the verdict of the trial:
The Advertising Provider agrees that any violation of these terms may result in an immediate ban from the Facebook Platform and all Facebook websites, products and services. The Advertising Provider acknowledges and agrees that a breach or threatened breach by the Advertising Provider of these terms would cause irreparable injury, that money damages would be an inadequate remedy,