Release energy, lose mass.

Burning gas increases entropy. Burning coal decreases mass, very slightly. And it doesn't mean what you're appear to be thinking because earth is not a closed system.

Saying that mining and enriching nuclear fuel produces greenhouse gases is a really pointless thing to focus on, considering that other fossil fuels also require mining and processing. Even if a given quantity of nuclear fuel required 100x the processing of oil, you'd still be ahead by several orders of magnitude because it contains so much more usable energy.

that if something else had happen, people would have been saying something else?

Profound. Deep. Insightful indeed.

Now look at Guantanamo.

the first million times. Do you have anything new to contribute?

Contrary to the Murdoch toilet paper you're swallowing, the EU administration is not that bloated. Its budget is tiny considering the area it covers.

England should be thrown out of the EU. Yes I said England.

Your gun fetishism is pathetic.

Malware sites have a technical effect that is unrelated to speech. Blocking them is as much censorship as is banning lead-based newspaper ink -- i.e. not at all.

> Neither of those is censorship - they're illegal

What a stupid thing to write. By your idiotic "logic," there's no censorship in China because the law says you can't criticize the Communist Party.

They rely on the public SSL PKI. Any rogue SSL cert registrar can let someone generate a cert for any domain.

Just like with Zune, Microsoft copied what's worst about their competition. I attribute it to cargo cult marketing.

And you can stick your sanctimoniousness up your ass.

Ever. Besides I can't even watch anything with DRM, except on my iPad.

Why would I?

Just as not offend the copyright holder? I don't give a fuck about copyright holders. So why would I?