Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: I'm surprised they aren't using rare earth metals (Score 1) 103

It's been found that rare earth metals like neodymium are highly effective as shark deterrents. No other fish are effected except skates, and the reaction of sharks to the metal is dramatic and instantaneous. The effect has something to do with a unique quality of shark skin, which when brought into the vicinity of neodymium produces an electric charge that sharks don't like at all.

For more information see

The only liability to this approach is that the metals are gradually depleted and must be replaced, but depending upon how much it's costing to maintain the fiber without it, it may be well worth it.


Comment: Post script (Score 1) 1

by NichardRixon (#45360001) Attached to: Shortages of drugs used in clinics and ERs have become common.

I realize that this issue is stretching what would ordinarily be considered on topic for /., but I've often been impressed by the kind of comments generated with respect to the kind of complicated social problems the issue represents. Healthcare is such a big problem in the U.S. that it's going to continue to effect all of us in ever greater ways until it's fixed. I'd really like to see how the contributors around here size it up. I'd be surprised if there weren't some fresh insights.

+ - Shortages of drugs used in clinics and ERs have become common.-> 1

Submitted by NichardRixon
NichardRixon (869899) writes "I don't know why it hasn't gathered more attention, but according to an article at, clinics all over the U.S. regularly deal with shortages of routinely used drugs. In some areas ambulances resort to carrying expired drugs to fill the gap, and NIH calls it a crisis.
U.S. healthcare ranks near the bottom of developed countries for quality of healthcare, even though we spend twice that of the second highest spending nation. What do you see as the real issues, and what is it going to take to get congress to fix them?"

Link to Original Source

+ - Slashdot, isn't it time to fix this bug!? 1

Submitted by NichardRixon
NichardRixon (869899) writes "As a Slashdot addict of long standing I rarely have the time to read all of the current stories, so I frequently leave a browser open to wherever I paused reading. That way when I come back I can continue where I left off. The trouble with this is that if I'm away too long I'll get part of the way through before the screen refreshes and it's all gone. I can search and maybe find the one I was reading, but unless my memory is in better form than usual I can forget about the rest.

I can't be the only victim here, so I'm asking others to speak up as well. Don't you agree that it's time this was fixed? I'm not a malcontent, but I'll bet you'd complain if the NYT sent operatives to the subways to snatch away day old copies of their paper from the hands of anyone reading them."

Comment: If money is no object (Score 1) 208

Buy all of your equipment from major manufacturers and you can hardly go wrong. Get your RF equipment from Rohde & Schwarz, especially high frequency signal generators and spectrum analyzers. Get your scope, meters and logic analyzer from Tektronix. Get most of the rest from Agilent. You will really have to better define the type of work you plan to do, however. For example, if you plan to work with cellular telephone equipment you will need a lot of specialized instruments just for that, but if not most of it would be useless. The cost of specialized equipment is higher than that of more mundane machines.

For planning purposes you might want to make a list of parameters associated with equipment you expect to be working with. For each record the frequencies, bandwidth and other functional parameters required. How many lines on your logic analyzer are you likely to require, and what depth memory? Do you want to have diagnostic and repair equipment or will your lab be devoted exclusively to R&D? Don't answer too quickly, because you may on occasion encounter a malfunctioning reference assembly, for example, and if you can fix it yourself it could save several days compared with sending it out for repair, or starting over with a replacement. When you complete the list it should be fairly easy to see what additional equipment you will need.

If you're unsure what you will need for some or all of it, contact sales people for the companies you plan to buy equipment from. The major companies generally give solid advice, because they would like you to buy from them again in the future. They will come to your location and arrange to demonstrate equipment for you. Of course you will still have to do your homework to evaluate their proposals.

For workbenches you will probably want to get standard height with a shelf running the full width of each and cabinets underneath. Chairs with armrests will be needed, and they should be adjustable height to suit your workbenches. Plan on lots of 48" florescent lights, good metal cabinets for storage and file cabinets for documents and drawings. A computer on each bench is not too many. You might want to look at a decent sized UPS system if it will be important that you keep some or all of the equipment running without interruption.

I think you will find that the sky's the limit when it comes to buying test and measuring equipment. You could easily order so much that you wouldn't have a place to put it all, then never use most of it. IMO there is no substitute for analyzing the work you plan to do, then match it up with the available instrumentation.

My overall advice is to buy what you know you will need before you begin working in your lab. Then you can easily add additional pieces as the need arises.

Good Luck! --NR


+ - Is trust in antivirus software strictly faith-based?

Submitted by NichardRixon
NichardRixon (869899) writes "Other than the operating system itself, it's doubtful that any software ordinarily run on our PCs has greater potential for abuse than antivirus applications. That's because they have access to virtually everything on the computer, yet I've never seen this issue discussed. Has there ever been a case of the trust placed in one of them being violated, or have any of them been directly compromised (modified to retrieve information, for example) by a third party? For a government agency intent on spying on it's citizens, striking a deal with a respected vendor would be better than having a sniffer hard-wired to an ISP router.

How could we know if one of them wasn't as trustworthy as we thought?"

Comment: This is not a big deal (Score 1) 127

by NichardRixon (#37712262) Attached to: Scientists Developed Artificial Structures That Can Self-Replicate

Run-away replication has already happened over forty years ago when the Starship Enterprise was overrun with tribbles. All it takes is a great intellect like that of Capt. James T. Kirk to deal with the problem.

What's that? Star Trek was a work of fiction?

That's different.

Never mind.


Comment: It happens, but it could be worse. (Score 1) 85

by NichardRixon (#37712126) Attached to: Rat Attack Causes Broadband Outage In Scotland
I worked on the installation of the telecommunications network for a new airport in Asia several years ago. The airport was built on land that had been a palm oil plantation so there were lots of rats until traps brought the population down. It happened rather frequently that rats would chew through our fibers and it was a major irritant, but the biggest problem they caused was the fact that cobras were attracted by the rats. ----- RN

Comment: The polygraph is not a lie detector (Score 1) 452

by NichardRixon (#32573582) Attached to: The Truth About the Polygraph, According To the NSA
Several people have said essentially this. The polygraph can measure your pulse and respiration rates, your blood pressure, your galvanic skin response, and from this data it can determine your pulse and respiration rates, your blood pressure and your galvanic skin response. No machine exists that can detect a lie. If a polygraph test uncovers any information at all it's because the person being tested offered it up. Anyone can "beat" a polygraph test simply by stating that they've told the truth as many times as necessary. A person's behavior during the test might raise concerns about other things, though. NR

Giant Planet Nine Times the Mass of Jupiter Found 73

Posted by Soulskill
from the fat-planets dept.
cremeglace writes "In the late 1990s, astronomers noticed a distinct warp in the disk of dust and gas orbiting a young star some 60 light-years from Earth. Now, using new analytical tools, researchers have discovered a giant planet lurking within the dusty haze. About nine times as massive as Jupiter and composed mainly of gas, the planet is only a few million years old, proving that such enormous planetary bodies can form rapidly." What's amazing about this is that the images taken of the star clearly show the planet first on one side of the star, and then the other, several years later.

Valve Delays Portal 2, Squashes Duke Nukem Rumors 135

Posted by Soulskill
from the duke-is-not-still-alive-still-alive dept.
SKYMTL writes "In a tongue-in-cheek commentary, Valve has announced the delay of Portal 2 and thrown water on the rumor fires regarding its E3 'surprise.' This surprise was rumored to be either Half-Life 3 or the revival of Duke Nukem, and it looks like neither will happen anytime soon."

Why Are Video Game Movies So Awful? 385

Posted by Soulskill
from the not-just-uwe dept.
An article at CNN discusses why big screen interpretations of video games, even successful ones, often fail to succeed at the box office. Quoting: "The problem with successfully adapting video games into hit Hollywood spin-offs may lie in the way in which stories for both mediums are designed and implemented. Game makers chasing the dream of playing George Lucas or Steven Spielberg will always strive to coax human emotion and convincing drama from increasingly photorealistic virtual elements. The Hollywood machine, in its endless chase for big bucks, can't help but exploit the latest hit interactive outing, often failing to realize it's often a specific gameplay mechanic, psychological meme or technical feature that makes the title so compelling. Both sides may very well continue to look down in disdain on the work that the opposite is doing, which can doom any collaborative efforts. But where the two roads truly diverge is in the way stories are fundamentally told. Films offer a single, linear tale that's open to individual interpretation, whereas games are meant to be experienced differently and in a multitude of ways by every player." On a related note, reader OrangeMonkey11 points out that an 8-minute short has showed up online that appears part of a pitch for a potential Mortal Kombat reboot movie. Hit the link below to take a look.

+ - Australian Internet Filtering Bad, Google Too.->

Submitted by NichardRixon
NichardRixon (869899) writes "These days I think many of us are finding an increasing need to be alert to the possibility of Google dust blurring our vision. We all wanted them to remain the good guys they started out to be, but more and more they resemble the wealthy corporation they really are. After reading /.'s Will Australia Follow China's Google Ban?, I was struck by a linked-in editorial by James Riley on ( While AFAIK I don't miss what Goggle has so far decided to censor, I have to take issue with anyone deciding for me what I may or may not know. (And besides, if they think an item's bad for me, what becomes of the poor Googlites who must review the offending content prior to deleting it?) No doubt Riley is correct in his assertion that Google already filters far more than the Australian government will, and I have to keep reminding myself that Google's decision to stop helping the Chinese government censor the Internet was retaliatory, not a moral stand. They made their peace with censorship long ago.

I do not at all support the Australian government's Internet filtering plan, but I have little patience for Google's protests on the grounds of free expression. Does anyone have a different take on this?

And besides that, why is it that lately every time I Google via Tor I have to prove I'm not a spammer submitting automated queries? Is fighting spam really the goal in this, or could it be that Tor makes it difficult for the advertisers to follow me around?"

Link to Original Source

CCI Power 6/40: one board, a megabyte of cache, and an attitude...