"The difference here is that a man was put in that situation - by Google...."

Oh, I must have misread. I thought it was Rahul Krishnakumar Vaid, not Google, who put himself in the position to be punished when he committed an act considered unlawful by his countrymen.

It sounds like freedom of expression is NOT his inalienable right. I do not ask Google or any other business abroad to spread and uphold MY belief in freedom of expression.