Comment: Re:Poor Hollywod (Score 1) 239
Comment: Poor Hollywod (Score 2, Insightful) 239
Comment: Quick Fix (Score 1) 472
Comment: Re:Chained to IE6 (Score 1) 416
Comment: I personally like TeamViewer (Score 1) 454
Are Game Consoles Ruining DLC? 399
from the download-the-rest-of-this-summary-for-five-bucks dept.
Comment: Re:In other news... (Score 1) 485
Comment: Re:Nintendo.... (Score 1) 291
Comment: Re:practical limits? (Score 1) 496
802.11N is awesome. It's faster than 100Mb ethernet even in real world tests. But does it scale well even in dense office buildings? In a cube-farm scenario, where there are computers every five meters in every direction in 3D space, is it really possible to get 100Mb speed?
Security isn't there yet, either. Someone in the parking lot could still put up an access point which advertises itself as being part of your company network, and your users will connect to it. Doing it right is possible in theory (configure computers such that they will only connect to APs which have certificates issued by your company's PKI) but Windows doesn't allow you to lock down wireless in such a way.
Don't forget that's 100mbps HALF duplex and shared amongst everyone using it. And even that's in a perfect world with no interference and no retransmits.