Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:In other words, we should give up. (Score 1) 2247

by MrRobahtsu (#37780848) Attached to: Ron Paul Suggests Axing 5 U.S. Federal Departments (and Budgets)

Crime will go up everywhere, disease will start to spread, and education will plummet.

The quality of education has declined every year since Carter created the Dept. of Education. It started declining before that, but the Dept. obviously has done very little good, and likely, more harm.

The vast majority of public housing is NOT slums or ghettos.

Even if that is true (and I don't think it is), almost all slums and getthos are public housing, and federal intrusion virtually always ruins the neighborhood.

How many research appears have you read? studies? ever compare agency's waste to corporate waste? inefficiency? no?

Actually, I've never read a research appear, whatever that is. Corporations don't spend my money or force me at gunpoint to donate to them. I don't care how private individuals spend their money, it's none of my business. Your analogy has no validity.

STFU

Well, there it is. I bow to your impeccable logic and persuasive prose. How could I possibly disagree with such eloquence and rational discourse.

Comment: Re:In other words, we should give up. (Score 1) 2247

by MrRobahtsu (#37776402) Attached to: Ron Paul Suggests Axing 5 U.S. Federal Departments (and Budgets)

No more energy research,

OMG! No more ethanol boondoggles! No more Solyndra investments! Whatever shall we do!??

no more low income housing

Now who will create more slums and ghettos?!?!

no more parks, no more public education, , no more roads & bridges.

Ron Paul called for abolsihing all state, county and city governments! Lynch him right now!!

So, are you actually a Ron Paul supporter, or did you think listing mostly craptacular failures of fedzilla and responsibilities of local governments would actually scare people into throwing away the constitution?

Comment: Re:Where's the Super Hero? (Score 1) 590

by MrRobahtsu (#37693632) Attached to: Real Life Super Hero Arrested

Eh, no, he was just a cop doing his job trying to arrest a prostitute. IIRC, there were other under-cover cops around, also. The prostitute was just trying to get out of getting arrested. The point is, if you don't know for damn sure who the bad guy is and you intervene, you're very likely to get it wrong. She was in no danger of being raped despite the Internet Armchair Quarterback protestations otherwise.

Comment: Where's the Super Hero? (Score 1) 590

by MrRobahtsu (#37690588) Attached to: Real Life Super Hero Arrested

I read an article about a delusional criminal and kept waiting for a hero to show up. I never saw one.

Now, I've been called lots of names because I carry a gun every day, but I'm not a vigilante. Intervening in that situation was just plain stupid. No, criminal. And it could have been much worse. There's the story of the guy who heard a woman screaming rape, so he came and shot her assailant. Turned out she was a prostitute and the guy he shot was an undercover cop.

I will defend myself and my family. Intervening when you have no idea who is the good guy and who is the bad guy is a good way to end up in jail or dead. For no good reason:
http://www.stoppingpower.net/commentary/comm_dangers_in_intervention.asp
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2010/09/robert-farago/dont-shoot-three-reasons-why-you-shouldnt-sav-a-stranger/

Idle

Physicists Discover Universal "Wet-Dog Shake" Rule 97

Posted by samzenpus
from the thank-you-science dept.
Dog owners can sleep easy tonight because physicists have discovered how rapidly a wet dog should oscillate its body to dry its fur. Presumably, dogs already know. From the article: "Today we have an answer thanks to the pioneering work of Andrew Dickerson at the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta and a few buddies. But more than that, their work generates an interesting new conundrum about the nature of shaken fur dynamics. Dickerson and co filmed a number of dogs shaking their fur and used the images to measure the period of oscillation of the dogs' skin. For a labrador retriever, this turns out to be 4.3 Hz."

"Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago." -- Bernard Berenson

Working...