Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Stronger rival? (Score 2) 215

by MrNemesis (#43547333) Attached to: MySQL Founders Reunite To Form SkySQL

Whilst I agree with you (having sweated blood over fixing corrupted MySQL tables more times than I'd care to mention), and wish there was more support for more robust databases, it seems most of the world hasn't caught up with this idea yet.

Not only do most webhosts only support/provide MySQL (IIRC due to Postgres and others not having quota support), but there's a vast swathe of projects out there that don't have support for anything other than MySQL. Heck, I was looking into upgrading my home install of Gallery only to find out that support for Postgres (or even SQLite) was dropped completely:
http://codex.galleryproject.org/Gallery3:Requirements

A similarly disheartening thread from Piwigo can be read here:
http://piwigo.org/forum/viewtopic.php?id=18008

Sadly, for a bewildering array of software it's MySQL or nothing. It's partly this monoculture that has, IMHO, contributed to much of the animosity against MySQL, since users are unable to even contemplate trying out something else.

£0.02

Comment: Re:Banks Matter(s) (Score 1) 150

by MrNemesis (#43348845) Attached to: Iain Banks: Extremely Ill With Cancer

And here's me wishing I hadn't been given my mod points over the April 1st weekend so I could have used them on a worthwhile post like this. I'll be raising a glass of that single malt this evening, and probably starting to re-read Use of Weapons again just to re-iterate your points about his worldview.

I'm not a huge reader by any means, but I've still read a boatload of sci-fi, and whilst there are dozens of books that have cooked up convincing, ,evocative, even enviable, realities, Banks' are the only ones where I've genuinely felt like the author is already living in it.

Comment: Re:Tragedy, and Strange Days (Score 1) 379

by MrNemesis (#43012581) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: How Would You Feel About Recording Your Entire Life?

Just as a counterpoint, the same subject matter was covered recently in the darkly satirical technocentric series "Black Mirror" in the UK, most especially in "The Entire History of You". Definitely worth a watch if you enjoyed Strange Days.

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Series/BlackMirror

Personally, I think ritual recording of memories is a terrible idea; most of us can already remember the good stuff pretty well, and not forgetting the bad stuff would be... well, pretty bloody traumatic.

Comment: Re:GW solution (Score 4, Informative) 264

by MrNemesis (#42795205) Attached to: Updated Model Puts Earth On the Edge of the Habitable Zone

Not directly related, but the XKCD "What If" scenario on just changing the rotation of the earth enough to avoid having leap-seconds would require 50,000 4m diameter rocky asteroids hitting the earth every second.

http://what-if.xkcd.com/26/

Back-of-a-fag-packet calculations that every nuclear and non-nuclear explosion in the history of civilisation wouldn't give enough oomph to move us more than a few km away from the sun (although that didn't stop anyone making films about it). http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0054790/

Open Source

Can Proprietary Language Teams Succeed By Going Open Source? 136

Posted by Soulskill
from the reply-hazy-ask-again dept.
JerkyBoy writes "RunRev maintains the proprietary LiveCode programming environment. Those familiar with HyperCard on the Mac would feel quite at home using the environment to produce simple applications, and possibly more, although the programming language it incorporates has a few significant shortcomings (e.g., true object orientation). But it is a very versatile environment, currently claiming support for Windows, Mac, Linux, iOS, Android, and server-side scripting. For us NOOBs who could never find the time to learn C++ and something like the wxWidgets or QT toolkits, it seems like a pretty good deal. Recently RunRev has done something interesting, however, and that is to create a Kickstarter campaign to move the environment to open source (~500K lines of code, ~700 files). The way that they describe it, it sounds like there will be a commercial version and an open-source version of the environment (hopefully not cripple-ware), and they are asking for money to do this. But I want to know: what are their chances of success with this model? How in the world can they make enough money to maintain their programmers and overhead while giving the environment away? In other words, if a company like RunRev announces that they are moving to an open-source model, should you become more interested or less interested in their product?"

Comment: Fluff article... (Score 3) 432

by MrNemesis (#42761331) Attached to: Is 'Brogramming' Killing Requirements Engineering?

....that seems to exist solely to either attempt to coin a phrase, or just blindly continue the meme of prepending "bro" to everything.

Coding has, sadly, always been "testosterone fuelled" simply by having so many more men in the profession than women for the majority of its history, despite the fact that the vast majority of nerds, geeks and just plain computery types are far and away from what I'd see as a "bro" (although as a recalcitrant Brit I might not fully grok the term, is a "bro")
I've not yet met any programmer (or indeed any slightly competent professional) that hasn't overindulged in various psychoactive substances at some point in time

The article seems to base it's findings on having watched The Social Network, and seems to think that because a college undergraduate and his mates became hojillionaires after a few beers (yup, it was totally that simple) that this is why software quality is going down the pan. Stupid privacy issues aside, I was under the impression that facebook had a fairly good track record on actual server security because it already had put a large emphasis on engineering standards; even if they don't, they wouldn't be the first company that started out as some frenzied and possibly coding session and later put on a professional hat and cleaned up its act. I wonder if Larry and Sergey had a beer fridge at Stanford?

The real reason "quality software" is apparently seen to be disappearing is because a) software engineering as a "methodical, engineering-heavy discipline" is both difficult and expensive, not to mention seen as boring by many, so many companies and individuals will skimp and b) because barriers to entry are so low and there's so much *more* software out there now (including just as much good, if not great stuff), it could conceivably give the impression that "good software" is drowning in a sea of mediocrity.

My 2p.

Comment: Re:RTFA that's whole point, not more cubicle drone (Score 2) 159

by MrNemesis (#42735797) Attached to: Google Gives 15,000 Raspberry Pis To UK Schools

AH, but if you break the license, are you still a "a lawful user"?

Yes. The whole point of statute, and the ensuing statutory rights, is that the rights they confer upon you can't be negated by a license, EULA, or even a contract signed in blood. The UK has a fairly good history of customer-friendly policies in this regard, frequently to the annoyance of foreign companies.

http://whatconsumer.co.uk/what-are-my-statutory-rights/

It gets a bit more nebulous as you describe the "rented device and service" scenario, but I don't believe that's been tested in the UK courts yet. There's certainly a lot of people who've hardhacked things like their Sky+ boxes to do things like add extra storage and migrating recordings off the box are common, and so far there's been no legal repercussions TTBOMK.

Comment: Re:What Germans do on New Year's (Score 1) 256

by MrNemesis (#42449851) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: What Is Your New Years Eve Tradition?

Glad someone brought this up! I was in Germany one NYE and, being a Brit, I was hussled in front of the TV to watch this, and everyone in the room was utterly shocked I'd never even hard of it; as far as I'm aware this custom is almost completely unheard of in the UK. As far as I can make out from Wikipedia, this sketch was broadcast in Germany in 1963 and became a cult hit almost instantly, whilst it's been forgotten about over here - no broadcasts in the UK in 30yrs apparently.

Classic little sketch, and a fantastic excuse for multiple chin-chins :)

What's so funny?

Working...