Comment: Re:About those Russians (Score 1) 567
Comment: Re:20,000+ people got a free lesson! (Score 4, Insightful) 79
My thankfulness goes only to my drive to work full time and study full time in a community college at the same time. That's the only reason I am not poor.
But don't let me keep you from fatalistic, lazy belief that poverty or prosperity are results of mere luck.
Comment: Re:20,000+ people got a free lesson! (Score 2) 79
It's possible that "the poor" have no choice but to try desperate means to get out of poverty.
More likely they are in poverty because their pattern of bad decisions such as falling for the get-rich-quick scams.
+ - TPB now hosted in North Korea-> 3
A week ago we could reveal that The Pirate Bay was accessed via Norway and Catalonya. The move was to ensure that these countries and regions will get attention to the issues at hand. Today we can reveal that we have been invited by the leader of the republic of Korea, to fight our battles from their network...""
Link to Original Source
+ - Deluge: We are entering a new phase of fossil fuels-> 1
Link to Original Source
+ - Stolen cellphone databases switched on in US->
Link to Original Source
Comment: Re:Yeah, no shit (Score 1) 114
The rest of us, i.e. those with a fully functioning brain, allow for multiple possible scenarios - at least until there's some proof to narrow them down.
Comment: Re:They can't blame sales tax (Score 3, Funny) 407
Comment: Re:They can't blame sales tax (Score 2) 407
-bought from BB
-ordered from amazon
-got it from amazon.
-returned the one from BB
Comment: Re:Phobos-Grunt? (Score 1) 117
Comment: Re:Swedish Jail? (Score 1) 160
Comment: Re:It's their own fault. (Score 1) 443
Selling at MSRP is hardly "overpriced" and they regularly gave out coupons for large discounts and had sales.
Outside of technical books, I generally prefer going to a brick and mortar for books over a site like Amazon even if it does cost me 20% more. It is much easier to search through a topic or genre for a book that interests me when there is a huge shelf full of actual books then trying to do searches on the internet. I tend to buy books for pleasure reading on impulse, so again, the internet model does not fit my buying habits very well.
Library
is where you can browse and read on impulse. With the added benefit of not having to pay for it. I don't remember the last time I bought a book which was not a textbook or children book (for my children that is)
Comment: Re:How does it compare with the other NVidia drive (Score 1) 289
Hey moderator!
This one isn't:
The Linux “team” of ATi is a one-man-show, and focuses only on workstations. Everything else is simply ignored.
You missed the part where AMD has devs working on the open driver as well.
As for the rest of your rant, everyone knows the fglrx driver sucks on Linux. What has changed is that ATI is now a subdivision of AMD, and the future of ATI graphics on Linux will be the open driver that is being (rapidly) developed as we speak, and in the end it'll be much better than anything NV is willing to provide.
Anyone brave enough to use that in-development version of AMD's open driver already knows what the future is going to look like. Give AMD another year or two to stabilize the open driver and bring it up to speed on chip support, performance tweaking, and handling corner-cases, and once that work makes it into the mainstream Linux releases, they will end up changing the world of Linux graphics support (as we've known it) forever.
After all, their driver will be entirely found within either the kernel (KMS) or Xorg itself (DRM/Mesa), so you'll no longer need a separate binary blob/package just to get hardware-accelerated 2D & 3D (anyone with AMD-ATI hardware will thus get all this goodness right out of the box, as soon as they install Linux). And thats just for starters...
Comment: Re:like trying to offer proof to a Birther (Score 2, Insightful) 1093
#1. Some of the data was deleted (obviously, it has been mentioned many times).
#2. Some of the data was contractually banned from being shared (the Met is working on getting this fixed, sent requests to 180 counties).
Secret and deleted data is NOT a good basis for anything, and the Met agrees, and wants to redo it transparently over the next three years.
I hope the Met gets permission to do that, I would love some really transparent / open process work around this.
I was shocked when I found out that stuff based on "secret" or unpublishable data, or deleted data was allowed to be written up in a peer reviewed journal. How the hell do you review something you can't see the data to?
While this is a 'pressing' issue in the west, and they there is a strong bias for action, screwing it up and having bad science will have a huge impact on how it is viewed by India and China in the future... it is worth doing it all in a hyper-transparent and straightforward way.