Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Two answers (Score 1) 314

by MpVpRb (#43676881) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Becoming a Programmer At 40?

No, programming ability does not decrease with age. I am approaching 60, writing the best code ever, and getting paid well to do it

Yes, there is extreme age discrimination in hiring. Most companies want young people, right out of college. They don't have health problems or families, and work long hours for low pay

Comment: This is probably impossible, but... (Score 1) 694

Before any law is passed, a simulation should be run to see what the side-effects will be

Obviously, this depends on the existence of accurate simulators, which currently do not exist

After simulation, if the law passes, it enters a trial period, where the actual results are studied

If, at the end of the trial period, the law does not appear to be working as expected, it expires automatically

If it passes the trial, another vote is taken to make it permanent

Comment: Re:PCs no longer Required (Score 1) 564

by MpVpRb (#43437835) Attached to: Why PC Sales Are Declining

>>Smartphones and to a lesser extent tablets are fulfilling the needs of the average person

I strongly disagree

I don't have or need a smartphone

I can't imagine a smartphone replacing my desktop computer and 30 inch screen for ANY task

When I use a computer, I want a GOOD computer..with keyboard, mouse and big screen

Comment: Software activation (Score 3, Insightful) 564

by MpVpRb (#43437819) Attached to: Why PC Sales Are Declining

One reason people don't buy new computers as often as they used to is software activation

I dread buying a new computer because moving all of my stuff to the new computer has become a multi-day ordeal of trying to convince Indian call center operators that I am not running the software on more than one computer

If I could buy a new machine, clone my hard drive and go, I would upgrade about three times as often

The Media

What Does It Actually Cost To Publish a Scientific Paper? 166

Posted by Unknown Lamer
from the one-trillion-dollars dept.
ananyo writes "Nature has published an investigation into the real costs of publishing research after delving into the secretive, murky world of science publishing. Few publishers (open access or otherwise-including Nature Publishing Group) would reveal their profit margins, but they've pieced together a picture of how much it really costs to publish a paper by talking to analysts and insiders. Quoting from the piece: '"The costs of research publishing can be much lower than people think," agrees Peter Binfield, co-founder of one of the newest open-access journals, PeerJ, and formerly a publisher at PLoS. But publishers of subscription journals insist that such views are misguided — born of a failure to appreciate the value they add to the papers they publish, and to the research community as a whole. They say that their commercial operations are in fact quite efficient, so that if a switch to open-access publishing led scientists to drive down fees by choosing cheaper journals, it would undermine important values such as editorial quality.' There's also a comment piece by three open access advocates setting out what they think needs to happen next to push forward the movement as well as a piece arguing that 'Objections to the Creative Commons attribution license are straw men raised by parties who want open access to be as closed as possible.'"

Unless you love someone, nothing else makes any sense. -- e.e. cummings

Working...