Link to Original Source
Link to Original Source
Do you have more information on Apple's security track-record? Seems to me to be much better than Microsoft or Android.
No, this is not true. Two main notes:
1) The only reason people hear about Android "malware" is because antivirus companies are allowed to provide antivirus software for Android. Rarely do they mention that it's people downloading pirated apps from shady third party app stores after they've disabled all the security features.
2) All those "jailbreaks" for iPhones? Those are ALL security exploits. If they can be used to jailbreak the phone, they can be (and have been) used to completely pwn the phone.
Easy solution: if the camera is vandalized, lock the doors and drive to the police station.
No way, the Google Now widget is indispensable.
When I turn on my phone in the morning, it tells me how long it'll take me to get to work, the current weather, any out-of-the-ordinary movement of the stocks I have in Google Finance, flight information if I have any coming up, release dates of video games movies or albums, etc. etc.
Pretty wonderful, and way more "magical" and "innovative" than anything Apple has done recently.
Link to Original Source
The thing is, he's not even making much sense. He's looking at fighting one fight and missing the overall battle.
Sure, preventing disease is a great thing and will save lives, but so will access to knowledge via the internet. Knowledge of how to prevent disease in the first place. Knowledge of how to best grow food in crappy soil. Knowledge of how to know if drinking water is safe. Knowledge of the first signs of disease so you can go to a doctor. Knowledge of preventative care.
Not to mention the fact that knowledge leads to development of society and better economies, which will help drag these nations out of poverty, which will do more for preventing disease than Gates could ever do.
No, the stock market reflects what the people who own the company think it's worth, which is absolutely tied to their current and perceived future value.
It's very straightforward when you think about it:
BP: The unknown was how bad the spill was going to be and how much it would cost them to clean up. Not to mention potential future dollars lost to people boycotting the brand. Uncertainty = stock price drop.
Facebook: Lots of companies are worth tons more than they're currently making because people believe they'll become profitable in the future. Example: if you got in on Apple when they were tiny, you'd be a bazillionaire now. Facebook then proved that they don't actually know how to make money well, and their stock fell flat.
Microsoft: It's not the $900m that made the stock drop $30b, it's what that number symbolizes. The world is quickly moving to making their primary computing devices phones and tablets, and the fact that Microsoft had to write off THAT MUCH unsold inventory means that they're going to be completely left behind in this revolution. That $30b is symbolic of the very real risk that Windows is dying.
Sure, it may put out the same amount of particles as more common things, but I imagine they're different types of particle. The site is dead so I can't check, but is there anything said about the relative dangers of one particle compared to another? I'm sure, for example, nanoparticles of plastics are much more hazardous than nanoparticles of burnt toast.
The difference is that ChromeOS is open source, so you can verify that's not actually the case.
I've had a few really neat moments thanks to Now. Besides the obvious birthday reminders, flight updates, etc. (which are great), it's told me a couple times about new albums releasing that day (which I didn't know about but was very interested in), and even that a new episode of Top Gear was scheduled for that night.
This is a very promising area of technology - knowing about things you want to know without you having to ask - and I'm glad to see Google pursuing it.
News is breaking today that Facebook is doing the same thing. http://www.pcworld.com/article/2043271/facebook-moves-to-remove-ads-displayed-with-controversial-content.html
I don't have any insider knowledge, but I suspect it has something to do with this: https://www.google.com/search?q=coppa+july+1st
YOU say that, but the majority of the US, who these officials represent, serve, and are employed by, disagree with you. You can't really expect the government to stop doing these things when so many people support it.
The internet can be like an echo chamber, especially in places like Slashdot where a lot of like-minded people come together. With all the outrage that you see, it's easy to be blind to the reality of the situation.
You need to work on changing the minds of the public, then maybe you'll see changes in the government.
The theory is not that you'll perform better. The theory is that you'll be far less inclined to take bribes, steal from the company, etc. because you're in a good place financially and you don't NEED the extra money to break even. Hiring someone with perfect credit is a lot less risky than hiring someone who is swimming in debt.