mod up. That statement, along with the following one, made no sense to me.
The leakage occurs because network operators are increasingly deploying a new version of the protocol used to run the Internet called IPv6.
I wasn't aware that IPv6 was fundamentally flawed. This sounds more like bad network design or something.
Came to post the same thing. 13% voted the same as I did. Why would anyone bother to write the AJAX code to update the page, but only include a subset of the information? Also: I am a fix 50/50 mix between Slashdot and Soylent now. Soylent isn't the ultimate solution since it is still the aging Slashcode. But at least the content is well-edited and the site makes sense!
He never said he was happy with Windows Server's versioning.
From the submission.
That is, users have a highly available network location where they can "go back" to how their file was an hour ago. How do you do that with Linux? This is a highly desirable situation for users.
I took "is highly desirable" to indicate he was happy with it.
If that was the case he'd still be on windows.
If what was the case?
He wants something better, that's both distributed and has version control.
The submission does not ask for those things.
You can only use a file system snapshot to store a database file because databases are designed specifically to handle this. 3-phase commit logic, journals, transaction logs... The database builds transactional capabilities on top of the file system. And even those don't work if the drive "lies" and says it committed data when it didn't. That's why you should be careful running an enterprise file system on consumer-grade drive.
It's the Microsoft Volume Shadow Service. It's not the same thing as Sharepoint. FYI: A Sharepoint admin recently told me "If you are just using Sharepoint as a way to share files, then you are using it's weakest most awful feature."
Can ZFS actually do versioning on every file close?
The versioning filesystem that Windows Server provides does not version at every file close. It does it via snapshots. So that shouldn't be part of the submitter's requirements.
Are you proposing that to run a legitimate business, you don't ever have to reveal to your customers such basic things like a phone number or a mailing address?
Actually, this happens all the time.
I have purchased ads from Google, and I have never been given their address. Google goes out of their way to make sure there is no way to find a human for technical support. Same goes for Steam, eBay, PayPal. Today companies give you a forum and expect the community to support themselves. It's almost impossible to find them unless they sell a physical product.
It would be hilarious if you still died. Like how, if Superman suddenly catches a falling person, they should not only die from hitting the Man of Steel's arms, but also be liquified by the fact that they were hit by something traveling hundreds of miles per hour.
The other Batman games suffered major issues at launch too. For example, Batman: Arkham Origins was impossible to complete at launch due to a bug. There was a river where the grapple would never connect so you couldn't get across. It took several patches before it worked reliably for everyone.
I know someone who has that monitor and likes it, because it makes text wider and thus easier to read.
Goodwill seems like a great organization until you dig deeper and discover they hire under privileged and disabled people only to exploit the related government handouts instead of doing it to benefit those people.
The summary makes an an unsupported and unclear accusation against Goodwill. If this submission is a legitimate question it should either eliminate this accusation or cite it and explain what criteria the submitter is looking for.
Submitter: What do you mean when you say they "exploit the related government handouts instead of doing it to benefit those people?" What exploitation are you talking about? My concern here is that it sounds like you would only donate to Goodwill if they refused the government handouts. But since all non-profits get handouts, in the form of tax benefits, I fear that no non-profit will meet your requirements.
They may be about money, but let us be clear that they aren't legitimate companies making money, they are about fraud.
Today, most spam is malware or scams. It's not like 10 years ago when it was businesses paying for "direct mailing." Looking at several people's spam filters, most of it purports to come from Walmart, Amazon, iTunes, Overstock.com,
I keep seeing people claiming that Arnica Montana cream works to reduce swelling. Unfortunately, they also sell Arnica Montana as a homeopathic pill.