Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Let them drink! (Score 2) 532

by Mitreya (#47329359) Attached to: NYC Loses Appeal To Ban Large Sugary Drinks

people who have bad eating habits

None of this precludes bad eating habits though. It just makes it more expensive or cumbersome (nor does it help people who drink several medium drinks throughout the day). So sounds like pointless grandstanding

Education is the way to help. I think the rules requiring posting calories on the menu had done a lot more to improve health than any such stupid ban. And no one contested that in court.

You can't really force people to make healthy choices by legislation. Information/labeling helps though.

Comment: Re:Happened before, will happen again (Score 1) 382

by Mitreya (#47174871) Attached to: High Frequency Trading and Finance's Race To Irrelevance

Dutch tulip panic in the 1700's ... The world moves on and financiers quickly explore new avenues, leaving the old behind

Ah, but did the people who lost on tulip investment get bailed out back then? Seems like the new way is to save the financial institutions because their collapse would be too damaging to the world.

Comment: Re:Mortgages are public records (Score 2, Informative) 294

Mortgages are public records. State and local governments already have all that data. Anyone can look it up.

I don't think mortgages are public record. Sales of houses and their prices are public record, but that is a far cry from knowing your actual mortgage (maybe you paid cash?)

There's a lot of funny stuff going on in the foreclosure area, but nobody has been analysing that as a "big data" problem.

Yes, "big data in a cloud with web 2.0" is the solution. It is reasonably known what "funny stuff" goes on, but instead of cracking down on these practices, we are going to do reports. Reports are needed to identify the problem when it is a mystery.

Comment: I like the non-commital announcement (Score 2) 83

by Mitreya (#47136723) Attached to: Oregon vs. Oracle: the Battle of Blame Heats Up

She did not commit to filing suit, but said, "I share your determination to recover every dollar to which Oregon is entitled."

You can say a lot of words without promising anything. I particularly like "recover every dollar to which Oregon is entitled". It could be $0 or $1 or $100M, because she didn't mention how much that is in her opinion.

Comment: Nope. (Score 5, Funny) 221

Does a manufacturer have the right to "brick" certain integral services just because the end user doesn't feel comfortable sharing a bunch of info with LG and other, unnamed third parties?

Of course they don't.
I am sure that just in 3-4 years, after a lawsuit, affected customers will be able to get a $7.50 credit good towards purchase of a new LG TV.

Comment: Re:Not First Amendment (Score 1) 160

You CAN be sued for any ACTUAL damages DIRECTLY related to your speech, IF it was defamatory / libelous.

Not disagreeing with you...
However, you can be SUCCESSFULLY sued for actual damages, blah blah. Without that, you can STILL be sued albeit unsuccessfully. An eventually-lost lawsuit would still cost you a lot of money to defend yourself. Maybe more money than whatever damages you are accused of.

Comment: Re:Sure, I guess I agree (Score 5, Insightful) 261

If by "right side" he means leaning towards totalitarianism and increasingly corporatist/fascist views towards online freedoms

He says so right there:

He added: 'This debate is about two very different visions: one vision that respects freedom and another that denies it.

I just don't know what makes him think that the current administration is on the "respect freedom" side of things.

Comment: Re:What's the difference (Score 2) 219

by Mitreya (#46915675) Attached to: Help EFF Test a New Tool To Stop Creepy Online Tracking

How's this different or better than adblock / ghostery / flashblock / noscript / do not accept third party cookies ?

Maybe it can replace 2+ of them? That would be nice. Installing 4-5 tools for one task is a pain

Also, NoScript specifically breaks 3 out of 4 websites until you figure out which half-a-dozen domains must execute JavaScript for each damn website. I remember how chase.com had a most fraudulent looking domain in order to let me login to my checking account.

Comment: Re:Not H1-Bs, offshore workers. (Score 1) 220

by Mitreya (#46791629) Attached to: California Utility May Replace IT Workers with H-1B Workers

It would be illegal for them to fire everyone then hire H1-Bs, and even if the off-shore companies place people that all happen to be H1-B, lawsuits will follow. How can the consulting company say they couldn't find competent employees when they know a bunch that got laid-off?

The article basically claims that with employees making 60K+, the rule of "cannot find competent employees" does not apply to H1-B, so they should be ok. Does anyone know more about this loophole that the article is talking about?

"No, no, I don't mind being called the smartest man in the world. I just wish it wasn't this one." -- Adrian Veidt/Ozymandias, WATCHMEN

Working...