Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
Note: You can take 10% off all Slashdot Deals with coupon code "slashdot10off." ×

Comment Re:You still go through HR for jobs? (Score 1) 242

I suppose you could view it slightly differently as "What is merit". If you define someone's worth solely by the quality and quantity of work they turn out, maybe. The thing is the "who you know" bit often times is a helpful proxy for "soft skills".

As a manager, if one of my team comes up to me and say "Hey, I worked with Joe at Acme, and he worked well with us, turned out high quality code, participated in the scrum, and wrote tight test cases." I'm going to take that interview. Now if Joe was a right asshat, he'd not have gotten the reference.

As a hiring manager, soft skills are important in my team, they reduce friction, and as any engineer knows, friction is wasted energy. Social friction is no different.


Comment Research (Score 1) 373

I recommend Charlie Miller's talk from DC 22 - in which he goes through the architecture of a number of vehicles. His goal was the opposite of yours, to find the most hack-able car to set up for his talk this year (and the preceding Jeep recall) but if you turn the crank in the other direction, you should be able to get to the conclusion you want:


Comment Seems like there's a simple middle ground solution (Score 4, Interesting) 139

Do a timed release. Once the FOIA request is completed, the requester gets X months of exclusivity to publish, and then it gets released publicly. This preserves the inventive for the journalists, while at the same time ensuring that even FOIA requests that don't produce something sexy enough to publish still become public access at the end of the exclusivity period.


Comment Re:Redundant technology (Score 1) 46

Precisely. My job is to run interference for my department, get them the things they need to be able to do their job and keep other depts from asking them questions, because I've answered them at aforementioned meetings.

Actually quite a tough job for an introvert, but I've managed.

That and mentoring the next generation of professionals are my main duties.


Comment Re:Redundant technology (Score 5, Insightful) 46

I've been wearing one since Christmas (thanks Santa!) and I have to say I don't think I'd wanna give it up now. It's a nice to have definitely, rather then a necessity, but so is my smart phone.

I have the type of job with double and triple stacked meetings 8 hrs a day and it's REALLY nice to be able to glance at my watch and find out where I need to be next, what the dial in for the conference bridge is etc without having to pull my phone out of my pocket, unlock it, etc. Means I'm late for fewer meetings.

It's also a lot more socially acceptable in my office at least to glance at a watch and check to see if that new email your phone is buzzing about is important enough to excuse yourself from the meeting or not. Also being able to screen a call without the fuss of pulling out a phone. Glance at the watch, see it's important, excuse myself from the meeting and pull my phone out on the way is a lot less disruptive.

So ya, it's a nice to have, but it's quickly becoming a high priority nice to have. I miss it when I forget to put it on in the morning (like today) because I have too little caffeine in my blood.

Like every other early adopter device, it's got bugs but it's over the "more trouble then it's worth" hurdle for me at least.


Comment Reading between the lines.... (Score 1) 145

This looks like it's more of a play for the embedded systems or IoT space. Look at the examples given, nuclear reactors, IoT, etc. These are specialized systems where it's possible to say "I've monitored the system for x time, and these are the things that should be running. OK, anything new running can't use the disk IO driver to write to the disk".

There was a similar proposal for a device to work on the engine bus but focused on communications. "We monitor the bus for the first X seconds and classify the traffic on it. Then if something new starts talking or an existing player suddenly starts communicating to something it has never talked to, we declare condition red and fire the photon torps."

Hyperbole aside of 100% protection against everything, this is not a bad strategy for very specialized systems. Doesn't do crap for a general purpose computing environment, but as we leverage general purpose OS and off the shelf hardware for more embedded/IoT applications, we begin to have uses for tools that are highly restrictive because the things they're protecting are well defined.


Comment Re:Affirmative Action (Score 2) 529

We could start with a decent family leave system (something half as good as the Nordic Countries and/or Canada)

Funny story - I'm a Canadian working for the Canadian office of a company that's (like most North American wide companies) predominately based in the US. The SHOCK when the US side of my team learned how much time off we get for maternity/paternity leave was amusing, followed by the scramble when they had to back-fill the role.

(For those who are unaware, Canada gives 6 months leave to each the mother and father. They can opt to consolidate that for a full year under the mother at their choice. The government pays full unemployment benefits for the duration and your employer is required to hold your position or equivalent for you, and you continue to accrue seniority/vacation/etc while you're away).


Comment Re:Why is ITT even eligible for federal student lo (Score 5, Funny) 85

These weren't federal loans, as far as I can tell from RTFA. In short the allegations say that this is what happened:

1) The private loan market cratered
2) ITT said, "No problem we'll sell loans to ourselves, backed by investors, and we'll guarantee those loans" (see equity backed mortgages, for a similar case study)
3) Lots of loans started to default
4) ITT did math and said "Oh Nos", if we pay off those guarantees it's going to look bad. I know, let's pay those loans ourselves for a bit instead, I'm sure they will start paying again.
5) They didn't start paying again
6) They had to come clean to investors, stock tanks
6) They got caught in the coverup
7) SEC sues, stock tanks somemore
8) (profit)*-1


Real Programs don't use shared text. Otherwise, how can they use functions for scratch space after they are finished calling them?