Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
Slashdot Deals: Cyber Monday Sale Extended! Courses ranging from coding to project management - all eLearning deals 20% off with coupon code "CYBERMONDAY20". ×

Comment Re:...would smell as shitty as any browser (Score 1) 91

NoScript is a HUGE improvement, in my experience. However, it's also a big pain in the ass to use, so I wouldn't foist it on my wife's computer for instance.

I think you're just doing it wrong... NoScript can easily be configured to allow everything by default. Then you just tell your wife it's a big "toggle" button she can click on when a site does things she doesn't like... (e.g. pop-ups/pop-unders, autoplay, and other annoyances)

Comment Re:Discussed before (Score 1) 290

Some libraries like libx264 are built for multiple cores especially when used with ffmpeg.

I know them quite well... I've done some minor dev work on them. But with multi-threading, you get diminishing returns and can't fully max-out all the cores, no matter how much you want to, you'll have some idle CPU time on some cores... increasing amounts as you increase the core count.

This is why Firewire and eSATA and Thunderbolt are preferred. All of them have independent chips which handle the work so the CPU doesn't have to do it.

A completely specious argument... The overhead of a USB transfer doesn't drag-down a modern CPU. Take just a few dollars of the money you'd pay for Firewire versions of your gear, and use it to get a slightly higher-end CPU. Now the overhead of USB is covered, you've saved some money, and you're better-off all-around.

Firewire is around because of legacy DV cameras. If Firewire was any good, eSATA wouldn't have ever appeared. But it's still around mostly because it had several years' head-start on USB3.
Thunderbolt is only a thing because Apple has a dog in the fight, so they insist on forcing it on their users like Firewire before it, or PPC processors before it, or now with H.264 and blocking Flash and WebM, or a million other examples.

I've said it is a poor choice for realtime work

Except I already said USB isn't good for real-time... But with most use cases USB can easily do faster-than-real-time, which eliminates the issue.

Your example would be to argue that Toyota Camry is fine for all home improvement because they are everywhere.

No, my argument would be that you've so far been unable to name even ONE single case, where your Toyota Camry has been insufficient for the task...

Comment Re: uh? (Score 1) 122

I found people without degrees or took extreamly specialized classes tend to be good in a small area, then be grossly inadequate in others.

I previously had an incompetent Jr employee under me, who happened to have a doctorate...

Meanwhile, the billionaire founders of Google, Microsoft, Oracle, Facebook and Dell are college drop-outs.

Comment Re:no, without linefeeds it says PRI*HTTP/2.0SM (Score 1) 150

> [...] poor reason to make a technical decision.

Sigh. Yet another "technical ideologist". Thing is, most of those have no clue about technology itself, but tout an ideal in which each and every decision is taken on "technical grounds". Which end up, for the above reason, by being just disguised gut feelings.

Know what? To do a good job, you should start by differentiating between your gut feelings and technical things (*both* are necessary and useful, but by all means, know which is which). If you can't muster that, you should steer clear of science and engineering.

Thank you!

Comment Re:Corporate death penalty (Score 1) 106

First, a corporation must act reasonably in the best interest of the general public.
Second, a corporation must act reasonably in the best interest of their employees where it doesn't conflict with the first rule.
Third, a corporation must act reasonably in the best interest of their shareholders where that doesn't conflict with the first or second rule.

+1, I think you could be on to something there.

Comment Re:Discussed before (Score 1) 290

The problem with USB is that it is CPU bound meaning that contention isn't as easy to remove as you think. For most video production work, the CPU is busy with processing the video

On a tech site, I'd think you'd know about multi-core CPUs and such... They're pretty common these days.

the practical rate is around 400MB/s (less than 60% actual efficieny).

That's not a question of efficiency, and theoretical gripes don't matter to anyone. In the real world, it's plenty fast, and you'd be hard pressed to point to an actual scenario where someone tried and found they were unable to use USB.

Comment Re:Proprietary charging cables are devil's work (Score 1) 290

Why would you need 12V for it to work for laptops?

Because at 5V you need to pull 3X as many amps over the wire to meet the power needs... Probably MORE, with conversion losses.

So, for a laptop that draws 90W (pretty common), at USB's 5V, that's over 20amps. Do you know what a USB cable that can supply 20amps will look like? Here's a hint: Those big long heavy orange $20+ extension cords are only rated for 15amps.

Anything cut to length will be too short.