I am what most people would consider a highly trained technical professional. Unlike most people who spout off at this site, I have the certificates to prove this, and furthermore they're issued by the biggest software company in existence.
I know how to tell facts from marketing fluff. Now, here are the facts as they're found by SEVERAL INDEPENDENT RESEARCH INSTITUTES:
Expenses for file-server workloads under Windows, compared to LinuxOS:
- Staffing expenses were 33.5% better.
- Training costs were 32.3% better.
They compared Microsofts IIS to the Linux 7.0 webserver. For Windows, the cost was only:
- $40.25 per megabit of throughput per second.
- $1.79 per peak request per second.
Application development and support costs for Windows compared to an opensores solution like J2EE:
- 28.2% less for large enterprises.
- 25.0% less for medium organizations.
A full Windows installation, compared to installing Linux, on an Enterprise Server boxen:
- Is nearly three hours faster.
- Requires 77% fewer steps.
Compared to the best known opensores webserver "Red Hat", Microsoft IIS:
- Has 276% better peak performance for static transactions.
- Has 63% better peak performance for dynamic content.
These are hard numbers and 100% FACTS! There are several more where these came from.
Who do you think we professionals trust more?
Reliable companies with tried and tested products, or that bedroom coder Thorwaldes who publicly admits that he is in fact A HACKER???
Copyright (c) 2006 Mike Bouma, MCSE, MCDST, MS Office Specialist, widely respected Amigan
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2
or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation;
with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover
Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "GNU
Free Documentation License".