Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:In a just world... (Score 0) 480

by MichaelKristopeit204 (#34390260) Attached to: Which Shipping Company Is Kindest To Your Packages?
re-moderating your troll posts with your network of moderation enabled accounts?

you're completely pathetic.

"Mikey Kristopeity" is operated by a pathetic individual attempting to steal my identity. they hypocritically game the systems of control on this website while condemning my use of multiple user accounts.

to the individual responsible: present yourself to me; admit what you've done, then i'll bring upon you the ultimate punishment for your transgressions.

Comment: Re:Why does this matter? (Score 1) 574

by MichaelKristopeit204 (#34376788) Attached to: Apple Bans Android Magazine App From App Store
why would i imagine things not at all related to the issue at bar?

a private store location is much different than a public space. microsoft didn't built means into the install process of loading applications onto windows to enable their refusal through a controlled private space, as apple has.

caveat emptor, pal.

Comment: Re:Apple getting desperate? (Score 1) 574

by MichaelKristopeit204 (#34376646) Attached to: Apple Bans Android Magazine App From App Store
you're an ignorant hypocrite.

if the app truly is stupid, it's not about not being ABLE to allow the app, it's about being WILLING.

was apple also "that insecure" that they didn't allow a stupid slider bar instead of a scroll wheel onto its ipods? stupid is bad, moron.

what insecurity are you referencing, anyways?

you're an idiot.

Comment: Re:What did Apple say about this? (Score 1) 311

by MichaelKristopeit204 (#34339870) Attached to: Facebook To Own the Word "Face"
facebook uses the display of the characters reading "face" ON EVERY SINGLE PAGE OF THEIR SERVICES. just because you can't comprehend them separately from the nearby characters reading "book" doesn't mean "face" is not being used.

what is relevant is they have been granted trademark status. simply because there is no confusion TO YOU, doesn't mean there CAN'T be confusion to anyone. are you a patent judge? a lawyer? went to law school? went to college? graduated high school? graduated anything? YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NECESSITY AND SUFFICIENCY. YOU HAVE NO REASON TO COMMENT ON LEGAL ISSUE.

you're an idiot.

"Call immediately. Time is running out. We both need to do something monstrous before we die." -- Message from Ralph Steadman to Hunter Thompson