Comment: Re:Stereotypes usually have some kernal of truth (Score 3, Insightful) 669
that which society has tried to force on them
When a person resists the expectations of our culture's gender socialization, we consider that person unconventional, non-conformist, deviant, or something of the sort.
However, when a person adopts those gender expectations, we call that "natural."
cheers, Mike
Comment: Stop supporting the culture industies (Score 1) 1870
Cheers, Mike
Comment: not surprising (Score 5, Insightful) 873
Cheers, Mike
Comment: Re:To Err is Human--to Persist is Microsoft? (Score 5, Insightful) 842
Cheers, Mike
Comment: Re:not smart (Score 1) 439
Cheers, Mike
Comment: Re:Will there be no wiki truths? (Score 3, Insightful) 439
Flagged revisions do no more, and no less, than allow people to tag revisions which have been reviewed to be vandalism-free.
What about vandalism that's not so easy to spot? Like a subtle change to an article that (presumably) is not on a lot of people's watchlist? How would the FlaggedRev system handle these types of edits? Would it create tacit approval for these changes? Would it be difficult to revert them at a later time, since at that point the rv would itself look like vandalism? Just a thought.
Cheers, Mike
Comment: Re:not smart (Score 1) 439
Cheers, Mike
Comment: Re:User preference to view un-reviewed articles? (Score 1) 439
Cheers, Mike
Comment: Re:Define 'trusted user' (Score 1) 439
Cheers, Mike