you must be on some of the best acid around!
I guess these ideals have an acidic effect on Statism.
I made a big mistake supporting Obama. Will you make the same one, just so I won't feel as bad?
So you're argument is Cruz might be an Obama of the right, roping in a lot of people and then carrying on as a progressive?
I'm confident that, were he to play it like that, he'd not win re-election.
I'm still not confident you've understood the systemic argument here.
You can paint it yellow, but it's still a really-short bus. That might make sense for very low-density areas, but I was surprised when I needed to hire a school bus for a Scout event last year that the newer full-sized buses actually get pretty amazing mileage. At 10-15 MPG, it's terrible for a car, but when you're carrying 60+ people, that's fantastic. Especially considering you can still buy a pickup truck that gets similar mileage. I was expecting the answer to come back at "7MPG highway" or something more proportional to automotive mileage.
Kudos to the anonymous mechanical engineers who design these things. I suspect it would be really hard to build a full-sized EV bus that used less total fuel, considering the transmission and charging losses, and the fuel equivalence for the additional wealth needed to purchase such a thing.
I believe you're confusing Vogons with wizards. Too much pipeweed, Gandalf?
After all of the bashing for those concerned about the no-talent rodeo clown's birth, I can't tell if Lefties actually care about this, or are just wallowing in recreational irony.
For the record, I'm shaving with Occam's Razor: the likeliest option to me is that Obama is a dope-smoking piece of work from Hawaii, who tarted up his literary biography to seem exotic, and used his original hard copy birth certificate for rolling paper. I really never have cared, and have been more fascinated by how this issue, itself, has been weaponized. Very instructive.
Nice try, though. I cannot commend the Good Book to you enough.
people who work in congress
I know what those five words mean, individually. That particular sequence seems a violation of the Incompleteness Theorem.
The crushing irony of your silly misreads is that you're making my point in a practical sense: our current Progressive economic course has bred what's tantamount to an aristocracy: if you're not caught with a live boy or a dead girl, you stay in office.
If you ACTUALLY want equality of opportunity, which will get you to a Pareto optimal society, you have to get off your wealth redistribution crack cocaine, and redistribute power.
You're right, but the fine is entirely down to the ICO. Remember the ACS: Law guy who was chasing file sharers over porn on bittorrent and left a list of his accused on his website for all to download stating personal information and associating their names width different flavours of porn?
He was fined a pathetic Â£1000 because the ICO didn't want him to endure the hardship of potentially losing his $1million house simply because the guy provided a "sworn statement" that he couldn't pay a higher fine even though he blatantly could.
There also seems to be a lot of picking and choosing about holding individuals liable - i.e. it seems to never happen even though the Data Protection Act explicitly allows for that.